Options
Phantom validation framework: a tool for systematic and reproducible medical phantom assessment
Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.17316
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2026-06
Sprache
English
TORE-DOI
Journal
Volume
142
Start Page
451
End Page
456
Citation
Procedia CIRP 142: 451–456 (2026)
Contribution to Conference
Publisher DOI
Scopus ID
Publisher
Elsevier
Peer Reviewed
true
Phantoms are physical models designed to mimic medical tissues and structures in medical imaging. They are used in medical research, quality assurance, and training. Despite their increasing application and widespread use, standardized frameworks for the verification and validation of phantoms remain insufficiently established, primarily due to the interdisciplinary challenges involved. This paper addresses this gap by identifying and categorizing essential validation aspects for medical imaging phantoms, derived from an extensive literature review. Building upon these categories—application validity, physiological validity, anatomical validity, user validity, economic validity, and concurrent validity—a structured validation matrix is proposed to guide users through a comprehensive interdisciplinary evaluation process. The matrix incorporates both objective measurements, such as imaging performance benchmarks and quantitative anatomical comparisons (e.g., Hounsfield Values, Dice coefficients, respectively), and subjective assessments from expert and user feedback. Emphasis is placed on aligning validation procedures with the specific purpose and intended use of each phantom, ensuring reproducibility through rigorous documentation of test conditions and outcomes. By integrating multidisciplinary criteria into a systematic validation framework, this work aims to enhance the reliability and usability of phantoms, providing a methodological tool embedded in the design process, which supports their development and application in advancing medical imaging technologies.
Subjects
phantom
medical imaging
validation
verification
framework
design method
DDC Class
616.0: Pathology, Deseaeses, Treatment
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Name
1-s2.0-S2212827126008644-main.pdf
Type
Main Article
Size
670.27 KB
Format
Adobe PDF