Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1007
Fulltext available Open Access
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchweisfurth, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorTietze, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorHerstatt, Cornelius-
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-01T11:11:24Zde_DE
dc.date.available2011-06-01T11:11:24Zde_DE
dc.date.issued2011de_DE
dc.identifier.citation18th International Product Development Management Conference. Delft, The Netherlands.de_DE
dc.identifier.other661162419de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://tubdok.tub.tuhh.de/handle/11420/1009-
dc.description.abstractThe importance of design for the success of product innovations has caught increasing attention of scholars lately (Rindova and Petkova, 2007, Verganti, 2008). Previous research is related to user-centered design (Brown, 2008, Veryzer and Borja de Mozota, 2005a), design contribution to NPD (Gemser and Leenders, 2001, Talke et al., 2009), or design-driven innovation (Dell'Era and erganti, 2009, Verganti, 2009). Apart from few seminal contributions (Clark, 1985, Dell'Era and Verganti, 2007a, Walsh, 1996) research on product innovations has yet insufficiently investigated the relationship of functional (i.e. technology) and design dimensions (i.e. aesthetics, product language). Drawing on the literature of dominant design (Abernathy and Utterback, 1978, Murmann and Frenken, 2006, Suárez and Utterback, 1995), technological evolution (Dosi, 1982, Iansiti and Khanna, 1995, Saviotti, 1996) and innovation in design (Borja de Mozota, 2003, Verganti, 2008) we suggest that product design innovations are related to technical innovation patterns and characteristics of technology trajectories. Hence, we explore the relationship of design and technological innovations throughout the evolution of product categories. We argue that periods of incremental technical change trigger the cumulative development of design innovations, where both technology and design continue to develop along previously established trajectories. Contrarily, after periods of disruptive technical change that transform previously established product architectures into new industry standards, design innovation becomes increasingly important. Emerging dominant technological designs open opportunities for innovation in design and hence trigger periods where design features become essential for product diversification. Our explorative study builds on two pairs of meso-level case studies. Both, the technical developments of loudspeakers (Borwick, 2001) and bicycles (Dowell, 2006, Dowell and Swaminathan, 2006) are characterized by incremental improvements where the products’ architecture remained largely unchanged and thus product designs evolved along established paths. For instance, bicycles became stepwise equipped with increasingly complex suspension forks, gear systems and more efficient brakes but always maintained the ‘original’ product architecture. Similarly, the quality of loudspeakers has increased continuously while they became cheaper to manufacture due to stepwise enhanced membrane materials and constantly improved bandpass filters. On the contrary, technical developments of watches (Glasmeier, 1991) and cameras (Carranza, 2010, Chandy and Tellis, 2000) are characterized by major, disruptive technological changes altering the products’ architecture that opened new design spaces for a variety of new product types. For instance, quartz watches allowed new designs due the replacement of mechanical clockworks. Also, the novel technical architecture of digital cameras enabled a range of new product designs (e.g. ultra compact or prosumer cameras). For our analysis we employ US patent data from 1970 onwards, using utility patents as proxy for technological and design patents as proxy for design innovations. To validate our findings we deepen our analysis with expert interviews from each industry and archival data. We contribute to previous research by deriving propositions on relationship of technology and design innovations. We propose that design innovation is stationary during eras of ferment, after technological discontinuities. Then, our findings suggest that the importance of design innovations increases strongly after the emergence of a dominant design, during the early stages of incremental change. In the later era of incremental change, we propose that incremental (cumulative) technology developments positively coevolve with continuous design developments.de
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttp://doku.b.tu-harburg.de/doku/lic_ohne_pod.phpde
dc.subjectDesign ; Technology ; Coevolution ; Trajectory ; Technology cyclede_DE
dc.titleExploring the coevolution of design and technologyde_DE
dc.typeinProceedingsde_DE
dc.date.updated2011-06-01T13:38:26Zde_DE
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:101:1-201505273223-
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.1007-
dc.type.dinicontributionToPeriodical-
dc.subject.ddccode330-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:101:1-201505273223-
tuhh.publikation.typconferenceObjectde_DE
tuhh.publikation.source18th International Product Development Management Conference. Delft, The Netherlands.de_DE
tuhh.opus.id1101de_DE
tuhh.gvk.ppn661162419de_DE
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
dc.identifier.hdl11420/1009-
tuhh.abstract.germanThe importance of design for the success of product innovations has caught increasing attention of scholars lately (Rindova and Petkova, 2007, Verganti, 2008). Previous research is related to user-centered design (Brown, 2008, Veryzer and Borja de Mozota, 2005a), design contribution to NPD (Gemser and Leenders, 2001, Talke et al., 2009), or design-driven innovation (Dell'Era and erganti, 2009, Verganti, 2009). Apart from few seminal contributions (Clark, 1985, Dell'Era and Verganti, 2007a, Walsh, 1996) research on product innovations has yet insufficiently investigated the relationship of functional (i.e. technology) and design dimensions (i.e. aesthetics, product language). Drawing on the literature of dominant design (Abernathy and Utterback, 1978, Murmann and Frenken, 2006, Suárez and Utterback, 1995), technological evolution (Dosi, 1982, Iansiti and Khanna, 1995, Saviotti, 1996) and innovation in design (Borja de Mozota, 2003, Verganti, 2008) we suggest that product design innovations are related to technical innovation patterns and characteristics of technology trajectories. Hence, we explore the relationship of design and technological innovations throughout the evolution of product categories. We argue that periods of incremental technical change trigger the cumulative development of design innovations, where both technology and design continue to develop along previously established trajectories. Contrarily, after periods of disruptive technical change that transform previously established product architectures into new industry standards, design innovation becomes increasingly important. Emerging dominant technological designs open opportunities for innovation in design and hence trigger periods where design features become essential for product diversification. Our explorative study builds on two pairs of meso-level case studies. Both, the technical developments of loudspeakers (Borwick, 2001) and bicycles (Dowell, 2006, Dowell and Swaminathan, 2006) are characterized by incremental improvements where the products’ architecture remained largely unchanged and thus product designs evolved along established paths. For instance, bicycles became stepwise equipped with increasingly complex suspension forks, gear systems and more efficient brakes but always maintained the ‘original’ product architecture. Similarly, the quality of loudspeakers has increased continuously while they became cheaper to manufacture due to stepwise enhanced membrane materials and constantly improved bandpass filters. On the contrary, technical developments of watches (Glasmeier, 1991) and cameras (Carranza, 2010, Chandy and Tellis, 2000) are characterized by major, disruptive technological changes altering the products’ architecture that opened new design spaces for a variety of new product types. For instance, quartz watches allowed new designs due the replacement of mechanical clockworks. Also, the novel technical architecture of digital cameras enabled a range of new product designs (e.g. ultra compact or prosumer cameras). For our analysis we employ US patent data from 1970 onwards, using utility patents as proxy for technological and design patents as proxy for design innovations. To validate our findings we deepen our analysis with expert interviews from each industry and archival data. We contribute to previous research by deriving propositions on relationship of technology and design innovations. We propose that design innovation is stationary during eras of ferment, after technological discontinuities. Then, our findings suggest that the importance of design innovations increases strongly after the emergence of a dominant design, during the early stages of incremental change. In the later era of incremental change, we propose that incremental (cumulative) technology developments positively coevolve with continuous design developments.de_DE
tuhh.publication.instituteTechnologie- und Innovationsmanagement W-7de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.1007-
tuhh.type.opusInProceedings (Aufsatz / Paper einer Konferenz etc.)-
tuhh.institute.germanTechnologie- und Innovationsmanagement W-7de
tuhh.institute.englishTechnology and Innovation Management W-7en
tuhh.institute.id13de_DE
tuhh.type.id16de_DE
tuhh.gvk.hasppntrue-
tuhh.hasurnfalse-
dc.type.drivercontributionToPeriodical-
dc.identifier.oclc930768572-
dc.type.casraiConference Paper-
datacite.resourceTypeConference Paper-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralText-
item.creatorOrcidSchweisfurth, Tim-
item.creatorOrcidTietze, Frank-
item.creatorOrcidHerstatt, Cornelius-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorGNDSchweisfurth, Tim-
item.creatorGNDTietze, Frank-
item.creatorGNDHerstatt, Cornelius-
item.mappedtypeinProceedings-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeinProceedings-
crisitem.author.deptOrganizational Design and Collaboration Engineering W-13-
crisitem.author.deptTechnologie- und Innovationsmanagement W-7-
crisitem.author.deptTechnologie- und Innovationsmanagement W-7-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6774-3912-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2899-6415-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5585-1169-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie (W)-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie (W)-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie (W)-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,680
Last Week
4
Last month
12
checked on Jan 29, 2023

Download(s)

1,046
checked on Jan 29, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

Items in TORE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.