Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1697
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWulf, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorKaltschmitt, Martin-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-27T08:22:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-27T08:22:18Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-23-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.3390/su10061699-
dc.identifier.citationSustainability 10 (6): 1699 (2018)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://tubdok.tub.tuhh.de/handle/11420/1700-
dc.description.abstractHydrogen mobility is one option for reducing local emissions, avoiding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and moving away from a mainly oil-based transport system towards a diversification of energy sources. As hydrogen production can be based on a broad variety of technologies already existing or under development, a comprehensive assessment of the different supply chains is necessary regarding not only costs but also diverse environmental impacts. Therefore, in this paper, a broad variety of hydrogen production technologies using different energy sources, renewable and fossil, are exemplarily assessed with the help of a Life Cycle Assessment and a cost assessment for Germany. As environmental impacts, along with the impact category Climate change, five more advanced impact categories are assessed. The results show that from an environmental point of view, PEM and alkaline electrolysis are characterized by the lowest results in five out of six impact categories. Supply chains using fossil fuels, in contrast, have the lowest supply costs; this is true, e.g., for steam methane reforming. Solar powered hydrogen production shows low impacts during hydrogen production but high impacts for transport and distribution to Germany. There is no single supply chain that is the most promising for every aspect assessed here. Either costs have to be lowered further or supply chains with selected environmental impacts have to be modified.-
dc.description.abstractHydrogen mobility is one option for reducing local emissions, avoiding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and moving away from a mainly oil-based transport system towards a diversification of energy sources. As hydrogen production can be based on a broad variety of technologies already existing or under development, a comprehensive assessment of the different supply chains is necessary regarding not only costs but also diverse environmental impacts. Therefore, in this paper, a broad variety of hydrogen production technologies using different energy sources, renewable and fossil, are exemplarily assessed with the help of a Life Cycle Assessment and a cost assessment for Germany. As environmental impacts, along with the impact category Climate change, five more advanced impact categories are assessed. The results show that from an environmental point of view, PEM and alkaline electrolysis are characterized by the lowest results in five out of six impact categories. Supply chains using fossil fuels, in contrast, have the lowest supply costs; this is true, e.g., for steam methane reforming. Solar powered hydrogen production shows low impacts during hydrogen production but high impacts for transport and distribution to Germany. There is no single supply chain that is the most promising for every aspect assessed here. Either costs have to be lowered further or supply chains with selected environmental impacts have to be modified.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institutede_DE
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityde_DE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjecthydrogen productionde_DE
dc.subjecthydrogen transportde_DE
dc.subjectLife Cycle Assessmentde_DE
dc.subjectcostingde_DE
dc.subject.ddc380: Handel, Kommunikation, Verkehrde_DE
dc.subject.ddc550: Geowissenschaftende_DE
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftende_DE
dc.titleHydrogen supply chains for mobility : environmental and economic assessmentde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.date.updated2018-06-25T07:42:54Z-
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.05396-
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.1697-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.subject.ddccode620-
dc.subject.ddccode380-
dc.subject.ddccode550-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.05396de_DE
tuhh.oai.showtrue-
dc.identifier.hdl11420/1700-
tuhh.abstract.englishHydrogen mobility is one option for reducing local emissions, avoiding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and moving away from a mainly oil-based transport system towards a diversification of energy sources. As hydrogen production can be based on a broad variety of technologies already existing or under development, a comprehensive assessment of the different supply chains is necessary regarding not only costs but also diverse environmental impacts. Therefore, in this paper, a broad variety of hydrogen production technologies using different energy sources, renewable and fossil, are exemplarily assessed with the help of a Life Cycle Assessment and a cost assessment for Germany. As environmental impacts, along with the impact category Climate change, five more advanced impact categories are assessed. The results show that from an environmental point of view, PEM and alkaline electrolysis are characterized by the lowest results in five out of six impact categories. Supply chains using fossil fuels, in contrast, have the lowest supply costs; this is true, e.g., for steam methane reforming. Solar powered hydrogen production shows low impacts during hydrogen production but high impacts for transport and distribution to Germany. There is no single supply chain that is the most promising for every aspect assessed here. Either costs have to be lowered further or supply chains with selected environmental impacts have to be modified.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.3390/su10061699-
tuhh.publication.instituteUmwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.1697-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
tuhh.institute.germanUmwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9de
tuhh.institute.englishUmwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9de_DE
tuhh.gvk.hasppnfalse-
tuhh.hasurnfalse-
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde_DE
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.rights.ccbyde_DE
dc.rights.ccversion4.0de_DE
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.issue6de_DE
tuhh.container.volume10 (2018)de_DE
tuhh.container.startpageArt.-Nr. 1699de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorOrcidWulf, Christina-
item.creatorOrcidKaltschmitt, Martin-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorGNDWulf, Christina-
item.creatorGNDKaltschmitt, Martin-
crisitem.author.deptUmwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2698-0089-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Verfahrenstechnik-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
sustainability-10-01699.pdfVerlags-PDF2,87 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

341
Last Week
6
Last month
14
checked on Mar 28, 2020

Download(s)

214
checked on Mar 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons