Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1875
Publisher DOI: 10.23773/2017_12
Title: Supply chain sustainability performance indicators : a content analysis based on published standards and guidelines
Language: English
Authors: Saeed, Muhammad Amad 
Kersten, Wolfgang 
Keywords: sustainable supply chain management;performance measurement;content analysis;sustainability performance indicators
Issue Date: 28-Dec-2017
Publisher: BVL International
Source: Logistics Research 1 (10) : (2017), art. no. 12
Journal or Series Name: Logistics research 
Abstract (english): The goal of this paper is to provide researchers and practitioners with the required guidance to achieve a better assessment of the sustainability-related performance of an organization and its supply chain (SC). In order to achieve this, standards and guidelines covering three sustainability dimensions (economic, social, and environmental) were analyzed for the identification of sustainability performance indicators (SPIs). A content analysis approach was applied for the data collection and analysis. Twelve international standards and guidelines were identified and selected for the purpose of conducting an analysis to integrate the latest findings on SPIs in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). The findings of the content analysis revealed 232 original set of instances of sustainability-related information, of which 46% were related to the environmental dimension, 43% were related to the social dimension and 11% were related to the economic dimension of sustainability. In order to provide a better understanding and evaluation, each sustainability dimension was characterized using attribute categories. A descriptive evaluation of the academic literature, standards, and guidelines resulted in 18 attribute categories. Collected indicators were classified according to these attribute categories. In-depth analysis, restructuring, standardizing of attribute categories and indicators have led to 70 unique and coherent SPIs. Out of which 49% indicators were identified as environmental SPIs, 37% as social SPIs and 14% as economic SPIs. The results revealed a complete lack of agreement among the current standards on how to measure the sustainability-related performance of an organization and its SC.
URI: http://tubdok.tub.tuhh.de/handle/11420/1878
DOI: 10.15480/882.1875
ISSN: 1865-0368
Institute: Logistik und Unternehmensführung W-2 
Type: (wissenschaftlicher) Artikel
License: CC BY 4.0 (Attribution) CC BY 4.0 (Attribution)
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
10.23773-2017-12.pdfVerlags-PDF1,76 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

78
Last Week
1
Last month
0
checked on Oct 27, 2020

Download(s)

38
checked on Oct 27, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons