Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1875
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaeed, Muhammad Amad-
dc.contributor.authorKersten, Wolfgang-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T07:59:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-26T07:59:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-28-
dc.identifier.citationLogistics Research 1 (10) : (2017), art. no. 12de_DE
dc.identifier.issn1865-0368de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://tubdok.tub.tuhh.de/handle/11420/1878-
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this paper is to provide researchers and practitioners with the required guidance to achieve a better assessment of the sustainability-related performance of an organization and its supply chain (SC). In order to achieve this, standards and guidelines covering three sustainability dimensions (economic, social, and environmental) were analyzed for the identification of sustainability performance indicators (SPIs). A content analysis approach was applied for the data collection and analysis. Twelve international standards and guidelines were identified and selected for the purpose of conducting an analysis to integrate the latest findings on SPIs in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). The findings of the content analysis revealed 232 original set of instances of sustainability-related information, of which 46% were related to the environmental dimension, 43% were related to the social dimension and 11% were related to the economic dimension of sustainability. In order to provide a better understanding and evaluation, each sustainability dimension was characterized using attribute categories. A descriptive evaluation of the academic literature, standards, and guidelines resulted in 18 attribute categories. Collected indicators were classified according to these attribute categories. In-depth analysis, restructuring, standardizing of attribute categories and indicators have led to 70 unique and coherent SPIs. Out of which 49% indicators were identified as environmental SPIs, 37% as social SPIs and 14% as economic SPIs. The results revealed a complete lack of agreement among the current standards on how to measure the sustainability-related performance of an organization and its SC.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherBVL Internationalde_DE
dc.relation.ispartofLogistics researchde_DE
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0de_DE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectsustainable supply chain managementde_DE
dc.subjectperformance measurementde_DE
dc.subjectcontent analysisde_DE
dc.subjectsustainability performance indicatorsde_DE
dc.subject.ddc330: Wirtschaftde_DE
dc.titleSupply chain sustainability performance indicators : a content analysis based on published standards and guidelinesde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.023916-
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.1875-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.subject.ddccode330-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.023916de_DE
tuhh.oai.showtrue-
dc.identifier.hdl11420/1878-
tuhh.abstract.englishThe goal of this paper is to provide researchers and practitioners with the required guidance to achieve a better assessment of the sustainability-related performance of an organization and its supply chain (SC). In order to achieve this, standards and guidelines covering three sustainability dimensions (economic, social, and environmental) were analyzed for the identification of sustainability performance indicators (SPIs). A content analysis approach was applied for the data collection and analysis. Twelve international standards and guidelines were identified and selected for the purpose of conducting an analysis to integrate the latest findings on SPIs in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM). The findings of the content analysis revealed 232 original set of instances of sustainability-related information, of which 46% were related to the environmental dimension, 43% were related to the social dimension and 11% were related to the economic dimension of sustainability. In order to provide a better understanding and evaluation, each sustainability dimension was characterized using attribute categories. A descriptive evaluation of the academic literature, standards, and guidelines resulted in 18 attribute categories. Collected indicators were classified according to these attribute categories. In-depth analysis, restructuring, standardizing of attribute categories and indicators have led to 70 unique and coherent SPIs. Out of which 49% indicators were identified as environmental SPIs, 37% as social SPIs and 14% as economic SPIs. The results revealed a complete lack of agreement among the current standards on how to measure the sustainability-related performance of an organization and its SC.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.23773/2017_12-
tuhh.publication.instituteLogistik und Unternehmensführung W-2de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.1875-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
tuhh.institute.germanLogistik und Unternehmensführung W-2de
tuhh.institute.englishLogistik und Unternehmensführung W-2de_DE
tuhh.gvk.hasppnfalse-
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde_DE
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.rights.ccversion4.0de_DE
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.issue1de_DE
tuhh.container.volume10de_DE
tuhh.container.startpageArt.-Nr. 12de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorOrcidSaeed, Muhammad Amad-
item.creatorOrcidKersten, Wolfgang-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.creatorGNDSaeed, Muhammad Amad-
item.creatorGNDKersten, Wolfgang-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptLogistik und Unternehmensführung W-2-
crisitem.author.deptLogistik und Unternehmensführung W-2-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
10.23773-2017-12.pdfVerlags-PDF1,76 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

77
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 20, 2020

Download(s)

37
checked on Oct 20, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons