Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2367
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCiavarella, Michele-
dc.contributor.authorPapangelo, Antonio-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-09T05:18:06Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-09T05:18:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationFacta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 1 (16): 65-75 (2018)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn2335-0164de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/3074-
dc.description.abstractIn a recent paper in Science, namely, “The Contact Sport of Rough Surfaces”, Carpick summarizes recent efforts in a “contact challenge” to predict in detail an elastic contact between the mathematically defined fractal rough surfaces under (very little) adhesion. He also suggests the next steps that are needed to “fulfill da Vinci’s dream of understanding what causes friction”. However, this is disappointing as friction has been studied since the times of Leonardo and in 500 years, no predictive model has emerged, nor any significant improvement from rough contact models. Similarly, a very large effort we have spent on the “sport” of studying rough surfaces has not made us any closer to being able to predict the coefficient of proportionality between wear loss and friction dissipation which was already observed by Reye in 1860. Recent nice simulations by Aghababaei, Warner and Molinari have confirmed the criterion for the formation of debris of a single particle, proposed in 1958 by Rabinowicz, as well as Reye’s assumption for the proportionality with frictional loss, which is very close to Archard anyway. More recent investigations under variable loads suggest that Reye’s assumption is probably much more general than Archard’s law. The attempts to obtain exact coefficients with rough surfaces models are very far from predictive, essentially because for fractals most authors fail to recognize that resolution-dependence of the contact area makes the models very ill-defined. We also suggest that in the models of wear, rough contacts should be considered “plastic” and “adhesive” and introduce a new length scale in the problem.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDFG (German Research Foundation) for funding the project HO 3852/11-1.de_DE
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherUniv.de_DE
dc.relation.ispartofFacta Universitatisde_DE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde_DE
dc.subjectRough Contactde_DE
dc.subjectFractalsde_DE
dc.subjectAdhesive Wearde_DE
dc.subjectReye’s Lawde_DE
dc.subjectArchard’s Lawde_DE
dc.subjectRabinowicz’ Criterionde_DE
dc.subject.ddc600: Technikde_DE
dc.titleThe “sport” of rough contacts and the fractal paradox in wear lawsde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.045151-
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.2367-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.subject.ddccode600-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.045151-
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
tuhh.abstract.englishIn a recent paper in Science, namely, “The Contact Sport of Rough Surfaces”, Carpick summarizes recent efforts in a “contact challenge” to predict in detail an elastic contact between the mathematically defined fractal rough surfaces under (very little) adhesion. He also suggests the next steps that are needed to “fulfill da Vinci’s dream of understanding what causes friction”. However, this is disappointing as friction has been studied since the times of Leonardo and in 500 years, no predictive model has emerged, nor any significant improvement from rough contact models. Similarly, a very large effort we have spent on the “sport” of studying rough surfaces has not made us any closer to being able to predict the coefficient of proportionality between wear loss and friction dissipation which was already observed by Reye in 1860. Recent nice simulations by Aghababaei, Warner and Molinari have confirmed the criterion for the formation of debris of a single particle, proposed in 1958 by Rabinowicz, as well as Reye’s assumption for the proportionality with frictional loss, which is very close to Archard anyway. More recent investigations under variable loads suggest that Reye’s assumption is probably much more general than Archard’s law. The attempts to obtain exact coefficients with rough surfaces models are very far from predictive, essentially because for fractals most authors fail to recognize that resolution-dependence of the contact area makes the models very ill-defined. We also suggest that in the models of wear, rough contacts should be considered “plastic” and “adhesive” and introduce a new length scale in the problem.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.22190/FUME180109011C-
tuhh.publication.instituteStrukturdynamik M-14de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.2367-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
tuhh.institute.germanStrukturdynamik M-14de
tuhh.institute.englishStrukturdynamik M-14de_DE
tuhh.gvk.hasppnfalse-
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde_DE
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_DE
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.issue1de_DE
tuhh.container.volume16de_DE
tuhh.container.startpage65de_DE
tuhh.container.endpage75de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
item.creatorGNDCiavarella, Michele-
item.creatorGNDPapangelo, Antonio-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.creatorOrcidCiavarella, Michele-
item.creatorOrcidPapangelo, Antonio-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptStrukturdynamik M-14-
crisitem.author.deptStrukturdynamik M-14-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6271-0081-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0214-904X-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Maschinenbau-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Maschinenbau-
Appears in Collections:Publications (tub.dok)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
3555-22553-2-PB.pdfVerlags-PDF564,81 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

51
checked on Aug 19, 2019

Download(s)

7
checked on Aug 19, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons