Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2860
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGollmann, Dieter-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T08:55:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-04T08:55:32Z-
dc.date.issued2006-05-25-
dc.identifier.citationElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 3 (157): 3-9 (2006-05-25)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn1571-0661de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/6991-
dc.description.abstractWe investigate how the term 'trust' has been used, and re-defined, in computer security, covering Trusted Computing Platforms, Trust Management, Trusted Computing, and Trusted Code. We conclude that trust is a dangerous word to use as it has manifold and sometimes contradictory meanings. There is no immediate problem when trust is used in a specific research area to denote some concept of interest. Difficulties arise when interfacing between communities that use this word differently, and with the general public which is unlikely to associate a word like trust with any specific technical definition adopted in a field of research. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherElsevierde_DE
dc.relation.ispartofElectronic notes in theoretical computer sciencede_DE
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0de_DE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de_DE
dc.subjectAccess controlde_DE
dc.subjectsecurity policiesde_DE
dc.subjecttrustde_DE
dc.subjecttrust managementde_DE
dc.subjecttrusted codede_DE
dc.subjecttrusted computingde_DE
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftende_DE
dc.titleWhy Trust is Bad for Securityde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.2860-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.0101807-
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
tuhh.abstract.englishWe investigate how the term 'trust' has been used, and re-defined, in computer security, covering Trusted Computing Platforms, Trust Management, Trusted Computing, and Trusted Code. We conclude that trust is a dangerous word to use as it has manifold and sometimes contradictory meanings. There is no immediate problem when trust is used in a specific research area to denote some concept of interest. Difficulties arise when interfacing between communities that use this word differently, and with the general public which is unlikely to associate a word like trust with any specific technical definition adopted in a field of research. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1016/j.entcs.2005.09.044-
tuhh.publication.instituteSicherheit in verteilten Anwendungen E-15de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.2860-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.volume157de_DE
tuhh.container.startpage3de_DE
tuhh.container.endpage9de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33646562485de_DE
local.status.inpressfalsede_DE
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorGNDGollmann, Dieter-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.creatorOrcidGollmann, Dieter-
crisitem.author.deptSicherheit in verteilten Anwendungen E-15-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Elektrotechnik, Informatik und Mathematik-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S1571066106002891-main.pdfVerlags-PDF177,9 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

65
Last Week
3
Last month
checked on Sep 29, 2020

Download(s)

12
checked on Sep 29, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons