Weng, MatthiasMatthiasWengGünther, Claas GeorgClaas GeorgGüntherKather, AlfonsAlfonsKather2019-03-202019-03-202013-01-01Energy Procedia (37): 1480-1489 (2013)http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2231In contrast to an Oxyfuel process with pulverised coal (PC) firing, possible advantages of a circulating fluidised bed combustion (CFBC) are the in-furnace sulphur dioxide removal - no additional sulphur dioxide removal downstream the steam generator might be necessary - And the feasibility for concepts with a reduced flue gas recirculation. In [1] design conditions for the overall process of an Oxyfuel CFBC with highest flue gas recirculation up to 75 % are compared to concepts with less recycled flue gas. Compared to [1], this work is not focussed on design aspects of the steam generator but rather on the changing structure of auxiliary power demand of an integrated overall process caused by a reduced flue gas recirculation. At full load operation and under realistic boundary conditions achievable efficiencies of an Oxyfuel CFBC will be examined and compared to the PC-fired Oxyfuel process. © 2013 The Author.en1876-6102201314801489Elsevierhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/CCSOxyfuelflue gas recirculationcirculating fluidised bedCFBCTechnische ChemieJournal Articleurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.02936910.15480/882.214910.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.02310.15480/882.2149Journal Article