Möws, StefanStefanMöwsAhrens, MarisaMarisaAhrensBecker, ChristianChristianBecker2022-09-142022-09-142022-06IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON 2022)http://hdl.handle.net/11420/13605This work presents the comparison of R-Vine Copulas (RVCs) and Quantile Regression Forests (QRF) used to forecast the reliable power output of a pool of wind power plants (WPPs) and solar power plants (SPPs). Both methods have been used to forecast the probability of deviations from the deterministic power forecast of WPPs and SPPs but have never been compared using the same basic data set for the parameterization and validation. RVCs are a mathematical model for the description of stochastic dependencies, while QRF is a data-driven machine learning model, which describes the relation between one or more predictor variables and a response variable by using a combination of decision-trees. Both methods will be explained briefly and applied to predict the power of different exemplary pools of WPPs and SPPs with the same basic weather data set. Our paper contributes by giving a quantitative comparison in reliability and performance of the generated forecasts as well as formulating recommendations for the use cases of both tools. The results show that QRF forecast with a higher reliability but are more limited in their use case then RVCs.enforecastingQuantile Regression ForestsR-Vine CopulaRenewable Energiesstochastic dependenciesMLE@TUHHConference Paper10.1109/MELECON53508.2022.9842990Conference Paper