Doostdar Kejdehi, MahsaMahsaDoostdar Kejdehizum Brock, JanusJanuszum BrockCeraso, AnnachiaraAnnachiaraCerasoMorales Rapallo, Ariana CarolinaAriana CarolinaMorales RapalloKuchta, KerstinKerstinKuchta2024-01-152024-01-152023-12-31Detritus 25: 65-70 (2023-12-31)https://hdl.handle.net/11420/45110Concrete is recognized as the second most consumed materials in the whole world. Therefore, applying circular solutions to concrete, like recycling or reusing can guarantee a considerable benefits in terms of environmental impacts. In this paper, a comparative life cycle assessment is done for different recipes of recycled concrete aggregates in comparison to a recipe of virgin concrete aggregate, which are used in a case study called “Musterbude”. The recycling rate of aggregates used in the recipes are 45%, 60%, and 100% and they are supplied from different resources. For environmental impacts calculation, each recipe is defined as a scenario and their impacts are compared to each. The life cycle assessment results show that, despite low performance in water depletion indicator, the recipes with 100% recycled aggregates shows the best performance from environmental point of view.en2611-4135Detritus2023Eurowaste SRLhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Life Sciences, BiologyComparative life cycle assessment of different recycled concrete aggregatesJournal Article10.15480/882.911910.31025/2611-4135/2023.1832410.15480/882.9119Journal Article