Oexmann, JochenJochenOexmannKather, AlfonsAlfonsKather2019-07-042019-07-042009-04-09Energy Procedia 1 (1): 799-806 (2009)http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2884A thermodynamic and economic comparison of post-combustion CO2capture processes using aqueous solutions of piperazine (PZ) promoted potassium carbonate (K2CO3) and monoethanolamine (MEA) based on fair boundary conditions and constant assumptions using rigorous thermodynamic models is described. In contrast to a first preliminary comparison, it is shown that under the stated assumptions and considered boundary conditions, a 7 m MEA solution performs better in both thermodynamic and economic terms than aqueous solutions of K2CO3and PZ.en1876-6102Energy procedia2009799806Elsevierhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/post-combustion CO2 captureMEApotassium carbonatepiperazineeconomicsTechnikIngenieurwissenschaftenPost-combustion CO₂ capture in coal-fired power plants : comparison of integrated chemical absorption processes with piperazine promoted potassium carbonate and MEAConference Paperurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.03764110.15480/882.231410.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.10610.15480/882.2314Conference Paper