Kiener, MaximilianMaximilianKiener2024-12-192024-12-192024-04-01Ethics 134 (3): 360-386 (2024-04-01)https://hdl.handle.net/11420/52706Bernard Williams described the case of a lorry driver who runs over a child through no fault of his own. In this article, I pursue two aims. First, I want to moti-vate a puzzle about Williams’s case, which I call the Lorry Driver Paradox and which consists of three individually plausible but jointly inconsistent claims. Second, I want to offer a solution to this paradox based on a novel approach to so-called strict moral answerability. I conclude by responding to the objection that strict answer-ability is a contradiction in terms.en0014-170420243360386Journal Article10.1086/728635Journal Article