TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. A scoping review on using real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth applications
 
Options

A scoping review on using real-world data to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth applications

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.16965
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2026-04-08
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Sara Gehder  
Data-Driven Innovation W-EXK2  
Brückner, Stefanie  
Gilbert, Stephen  
Göldner, Moritz  orcid-logo
Data-Driven Innovation W-EXK2  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.16965
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/62642
Journal
npj digital medicine  
Volume
9
Issue
1
Article Number
309
Citation
npj Digital Medicine 9 (1): 309 (2026)
Publisher DOI
10.1038/s41746-026-02562-0
PubMed ID
41951725
Publisher
Springer Nature
Peer Reviewed
true
Mobile health (mHealth) applications are increasingly integral to healthcare delivery, yet traditional randomized trials face practical challenges in evaluating these dynamic tools. Real-world data (RWD), collected during routine app use, offers a complementary pathway to real-world evidence (RWE) that may reflect how mHealth applications are used in everyday settings. We conducted a scoping review to map how naturally emerging RWD are currently used in peer-reviewed studies to evaluate patient-facing mHealth applications. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2007–November 2024) and extracted data on application type, RWD characteristics and study design aspects. Study-level, design-centred evidence levels for RWD-based effectiveness evaluations were assigned using a combined Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and FDA RWE framework. Seventy-two studies evaluating 61 unique mHealth applications were included. Most studies focused on mental health or metabolic conditions and relied predominantly on data actively reported by users, often via in-app surveys, with comparatively limited use of device-generated data or integration with system-generated data such as clinical or claims data. Single-group pre–post approaches were most frequently observed, while only a minority employed comparative observational, quasi-experimental, or randomized designs. These findings illustrate current patterns in the use of RWD for mHealth evaluation and highlight both opportunities and constraints in longitudinal and comparative assessments of mHealth applications in real-world contexts.
DDC Class
616: Diseases
Funding(s)
Projekt DEAL  
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

s41746-026-02562-0.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

1.2 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback