TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty
 
Options

Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2010-02-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Zustin, Jozef  
Krause, Matthias  
Breer, Stefan  
Hahn, Michael  
Domarus, Christoph von
Rüther, Wolfgang  
Sauter, Guido
Morlock, Michael  
Biomechanik M-3  
Amling, Michael  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/46431
Journal
The journal of bone & joint surgery  
Volume
92
Issue
2
Start Page
404
End Page
410
Citation
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 92 (2): 404-410 (2010)
Publisher DOI
10.2106/JBJS.H.01113
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-77950469916
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Background: Periprosthetic fractures have long been recognized as one of the major complications of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to develop a systematic and morphologic classification of the fracture mode based on pathogenesis. Methods: One hundred and seven retrieved specimens consisting of the femoral remnant and the femoral component of a total hip resurfacing arthroplasty that had failed as a result of a periprosthetic fracture were analyzed with regard to the morphologic failure mode. The location of the fracture line was used to differentiate the fractures. The fractures were also classified histopathologically as acute biomechanical, acute postnecrotic, or chronic biomechanical. Results: Fifty-nine percent (sixty-three) of the fractures occurred within the bone inside the femoral component. Fifty-one percent (fifty-five) of the fractures were classified morphologically as acute postnecrotic; 40% (forty-three), as chronic biomechanical; and 8% (nine), as acute biomechanical. Acute biomechanical fractures were found exclusively in the femoral neck and occurred earlier (mean time [and standard deviation] between implantation and revision, 41 ± 57 days) than acute postnecrotic fractures (mean time between implantation and revision, 149 ± 168 days; p = 0.002) or chronic biomechanical fractures (mean time between implantation and revision, 179 ± 165 days; p = 0.001). The latter two fracture types both occurred predominantly in the bone inside the femoral component. Conclusions: Three distinct fracture modes were characterized morphologically. Osteonecrosis was the most frequent cause of fracture-related failures. We suggest that an intraoperative mechanical injury of the femoral neck such as notching and/or malpositioning of the femoral component might lead to changes in the loading pattern or in the resistance to fracture of the femoral neck and may result in both acute and chronic biomechanical femoral neck fractures. These findings may serve as feedback information for the surgeon and possibly influence future therapeutic strategies.
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
620: Engineering
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback