TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion
 
Options

Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2015-09-18
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Bashkuev, Maxim
Checa Esteban, Sara  
Postigo, Sergio
Duda, Georg  
Schmidt, Hendrik  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/48222
Journal
Journal of biomechanics  
Volume
48
Issue
12
Start Page
3274
End Page
3282
Article Number
7265
Citation
Journal of Biomechanics 48 (12): 7265 (2015)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.024
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84942816321
Publisher
Elsevier
Lumbar spinal fusion is the most common approach for treating spinal disorders such as degeneration or instability. Although this procedure has been performed for many years, there are still important challenges that must be overcome and questions that need to be addressed regarding the high rates of non-union. The present finite element model study aimed to investigate the influence of different cage designs on the fusion process. An axisymmetric finite element model of a spinal segment with an interbody fusion cage was used. The fusion process was based on an existing mechano-regulation algorithm for tissue formation. With this model, the following principal concepts of cage design were investigated: (1) different cage geometries with constant compressive stiffness and (2) cage designs optimized to provide the ideal mechanical stimulus for bone formation, first at the beginning of fusion and then throughout the entire fusion process. The cage geometry substantially influenced the fusion outcome. A cage that created an optimized initial mechanical stimulus did not necessarily lead to accelerated fusion, but rather resulted in delayed fusion or non-union. In contrast, a cage made of a degradable material produced a significantly higher amount of bone and resulted in higher segmental stiffness. However, different compressive loads (250, 500 and 1000. N) substantially affected the amount of newly formed bone tissue. The results of the present study suggest that aiming for an optimal initial mechanical stimulus may be misleading because the initial mechanical environment is not preserved throughout the bone modeling process.
Subjects
Bone remodeling
Cages
Finite element analysis
Lumbar spinal fusion
Mechano-biology
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback