TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Stem size and stem alignment affects periprosthetic fracture risk and primary stability in cementless total hip arthroplasty
 
Options

Stem size and stem alignment affects periprosthetic fracture risk and primary stability in cementless total hip arthroplasty

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.8906
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2024-04
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Konow, Tobias 
Biomechanik M-3  
Glismann, Katja  
Biomechanik M-3  
Lampe, Frank  
Ondruschka, Benjamin  
Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
Morlock, Michael  
Biomechanik M-3  
Huber, Gerd  
Biomechanik M-3  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.8906
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/44482
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic research  
Volume
42
Issue
4
Start Page
829
End Page
836
Citation
Journal of Orthopaedic Research 42 (4): 829-836 (2024)
Publisher DOI
10.1002/jor.25729
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85177806710
Publisher
Wiley
The ideal stem size and stem position is important for the success of total hip arthroplasty, since it can affect early implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF). This study aimed to investigate how small deviations from the ideal stem size and position influences the PPF risk and primary stability. Six experienced surgeons performed preoperative templating based on which the benchmark size for each femur was determined. Consecutive implantations were performed in six cadaveric femur pairs—one side was implanted with an undersized stem followed by the benchmark size and the contralateral side with a benchmark size followed by an oversized stem (Corail, Depuy Synthes). Moreover, three different alignments (six varus, six neutral, six valgus-undersized) were compared using 18 femurs. Cortical strains during broaching and implantation were measured, and laser scans were used to determine final stem position. All specimens underwent dynamic loading. Primary stability was estimated from stem subsidence and pull-out forces. Templated stem size varied between surgeons (±1 size; p = 0.005). Undersizing increased stem subsidence by 320% (p < 0.001). Oversized stems exhibited 52% higher pull-out forces (p = 0.001) and 240% higher cortical strains (p = 0.056). Cortex strains increased with varus alignment (R2 = 0.356, p = 0.011) while primary stability decreased with valgus stem alignment (p = 0.043). Surgeons should be aware that small deviations from the ideal stem size and malalignments of the stem can significantly alter the mechanical situation and affect the success of their surgery.
Subjects
periprosthetic fracture
preoperative planning
primary stability
stem alignment
stem size
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
Funding(s)
Projekt DEAL  
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Journal Orthopaedic Research - 2023 - Konow - Stem size and stem alignment affects periprosthetic fracture risk and primary.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

2.6 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback