TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Sclerostin neutralizing antibody treatment enhances bone formation but does not rescue mechanically induced delayed healing
 
Options

Sclerostin neutralizing antibody treatment enhances bone formation but does not rescue mechanically induced delayed healing

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2018-09-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Kruck, Bettina
Zimmermann, Elizabeth A.  
Damerow, Sophie
Figge, Christine
Julien, Catherine
Wulsten, Dag  
Thiele, Tobias
Martin, Madge
Hamdy, Reggie
Reumann, Marie K.
Duda, Georg  
Checa Esteban, Sara  
Willie, Bettina M.  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/48176
Journal
Journal of bone and mineral research  
Volume
33
Issue
9
Start Page
1686
End Page
1697
Citation
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 33 (9): 1686-1697 (2018)
Publisher DOI
10.1002/jbmr.3454
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85047643604
Publisher
Oxford University Press
During bone healing, tissue formation processes are governed by mechanical strain. Sost/sclerostin, a key Wnt signaling inhibitor and mechano-sensitive pathway, is downregulated in response to mechanical loading. Sclerostin neutralizing antibody (SclAb) increases bone formation. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether sclerostin inhibition can rescue bone healing in situations of mechanical instability, which otherwise delay healing. We investigated SclAb's influence on tissue formation in a mouse femoral osteotomy, stabilized with rigid or semirigid external fixation. The different fixations allowed different magnitudes of interfragmentary movement during weight bearing, thereby influencing healing outcome. SclAb or vehicle (veh) was administeredand bone healing was assessed at multiple time points up to day 21 postoperatively by in vivo micro-computed tomography, histomorphometry, biomechanical testing, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression. Our results show that SclAb treatment caused a greater bone volume than veh. However, SclAb could not overcome the characteristic delayed healing of semirigid fixation. Indeed, semirigid fixation resulted in delayed healing with a prolonged endochondral ossification phase characterized by increased cartilage, lower bone volume fraction, and less bony bridging across the osteotomy gap than rigid fixation. In a control setting, SclAb negatively affected later stages of healing under rigid fixation, evidenced by the high degree of endosteal bridging at 21 days in the rigid-SclAb group compared with rigid-veh, indicating delayed fracture callus remodeling and bone marrow reconstitution. Under rigid fixation, Sost and sclerostin expression at the gene and protein level, respectively, were increased in SclAb compared with veh-treated bones, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism. Our results suggest that SclAb could be used to enhance overall bone mass but should be carefully considered in bone healing. SclAb may help to increase bone formation early in the healing process but not during advanced stages of fracture callus remodeling and not to overcome delayed healing in semirigid fixation. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Subjects
BONE HEALING
FIXATION STIFFNESS
FRACTURE CALLUS
IN VIVO MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
SCLEROSTIN
SOST
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback