TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Comparison and combination of axial induction and wake redirection control for wind farm power output maximisation and grid power reference tracking
 
Options

Comparison and combination of axial induction and wake redirection control for wind farm power output maximisation and grid power reference tracking

Publikationstyp
Conference Paper
Date Issued
2024-10
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Dittmer, Antje  
Sharan, Bindu  
Regelungstechnik E-14  
Werner, Herbert  
Regelungstechnik E-14  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/57091
Journal
IET Conference Proceedings  
Volume
2024
Issue
16
Start Page
857
End Page
864
Citation
23rd Wind and Solar Integration Workshop, WIW 2024
Contribution to Conference
23rd Wind and Solar Integration Workshop, WIW 2024  
Publisher DOI
10.1049/icp.2024.3887
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105002394885
Publisher
IET
This paper investigates the integration of axial induction control (AIC) and wake redirection control (WRC) in wind farms to optimise power output by addressing wake interactions among turbines that diminish wind speeds for downstream turbines. The study uses two analytical models, the Jensen Park and the Bastankhah Gaussian wake models, and three different software environments: FLORIS for wake effect simulation, FAST.Farm for mechanical load analysis, and WFSim for closed-loop simulations. The findings reveal that AIC, according to the Park model, offers potential power output improvements between 4% and 19% for wind turbine arrays of two to ten turbines, but WRC shows enhancements from 8% to 30% for the same number of turbines in an array, as calculated with the Gaussian model and the FLORIS software. However, a proof of concept in FAST.Farm with a two-turbine configuration demonstrates potential disadvantages of WRC, which increases tower loads considerably, motivating combined AIC-WRC to operate the turbine at the smallest yaw misalignment angle possible. Closed-loop simulations demonstrate a reduction in power reference tracking error by up to a factor of 3.9 using Koopman Model Predictive Control with combined AIC-WRC as compared to AIC control on the same simple two-turbine configuration.
Subjects
Axial Induction Control
Koopman
Model Predictive Control
Wake Redirection Control
DDC Class
600: Technology
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback