TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Rethinking trust in responsible AI
 
Options

Rethinking trust in responsible AI

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.17200
Publikationstyp
Conference Paper
Date Issued
2025
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Tropmann-Frick, Marina  
Gille, Michael  
Draheim, Susanne  
Pommerencke, Philine  
Kiener, Maximilian  
Ethics in Technology E-EXK8  
Bozenhard, Jonas 
Ethics in Technology E-EXK8  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.17200
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/63230
Journal
CEUR workshop proceedings  
Volume
4132
Start Page
112
End Page
119
Citation
28th European Workshop on Trustworthy AI, TRUST-AI 2025 & European Conference of Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2025
Contribution to Conference
28th European Workshop on Trustworthy AI, TRUST-AI 2025 & European Conference of Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2025  
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105038616273
Publisher
CEUR-WS
Trust is widely recognized as a core principle of Responsible AI, yet its interpretation varies significantly across disciplines. This paper examines how computer science, sociology, philosophy, and law conceptualize trust in AI systems, highlighting both tensions and complementarities. From a computer science perspective, trust is often approached as a set of system-level properties that should be formalized and evaluated with metrics. In contrast, the social sciences and humanities emphasize its relational, normative, and institutional dimensions. We argue that trust cannot be reduced to a single system property or technical measure, as it emerges from social-technical interactions involving users, developers, legal norms, and social expectations. To support interdisciplinary dialogue, we propose treating trust as a boundary concept that enables cooperation across epistemic communities acknowledging conceptual differences. Trust is widely recognized as a core principle of Responsible AI, yet its interpretation varies significantly across disciplines. This paper examines how computer science, sociology, philosophy, and law conceptualize trust in AI systems, highlighting both tensions and complementarities. From a computer science perspective, trust is often approached as a set of system-level properties that should be formalized and evaluated with metrics. In contrast, the social sciences and humanities emphasize its relational, normative, and institutional dimensions. We argue that trust cannot be reduced to a single system property or technical measure, as it emerges from social-technical interactions involving users, developers, legal norms, and social expectations. To support interdisciplinary dialogue, we propose treating trust as a boundary concept that enables cooperation across epistemic communities acknowledging conceptual differences.
Subjects
AI governance
boundary concept
interdisciplinarity
Responsible AI
trust
trustworthy AI
DDC Class
005: Computer Programming, Programs, Data and Security
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

short40.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

1.88 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback