TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Testing copula regression against benchmark models for point and interval estimation of tree wood volume in beech stands
 
Options

Testing copula regression against benchmark models for point and interval estimation of tree wood volume in beech stands

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2012-02-24
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Serinaldi, Francesco 
Grimaldi, Salvatore  
Abdolhosseini, Mohammad
Corona, Piermaria
Cimini, Dora
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/62175
Journal
European journal of forest research  
Volume
131
Issue
5
Start Page
1313
End Page
1326
Citation
European Journal of Forest Research 131 (5): 1313-1326 (2012)
Publisher DOI
10.1007/s10342-012-0600-2
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84865806351
Publisher
Springer
This study compares copula regression, recently introduced in the forest biometric literature, with four benchmark regression models for computing wood volume V in forest stands given the values of diameter at breast height D and total height H, and suggests a set of statistical techniques for the accurate assessment of model performance. Two regression models deduced from the trivariate copula-based distribution of V, D, and H are tested against the classical Spurr's model and Schumacher-Hall's model based on allometric and geometric concepts, and two regression models that rely on Box-Cox transformed variables and are in a middle ground, in terms of model complexity, between copula-based regression and classical models. The accuracy of the point estimates of V is assessed by a suitable set of performance criteria and the nonparametric sign test, whereas the associated uncertainty is evaluated by comparing empirical and nominal coverage probabilities of the prediction intervals. Focusing on point estimates, the Schumacher-Hall's model outperforms the other models in terms of several performance criteria. The sign test points out that the differences among the models that involve D and H as separate covariates are not definitely significant, whereas these models outperform the models with a single covariate. As far as the interval estimates are of concern, the four benchmark models provide comparable interval estimates. The copula-based model with parametric marginals is definitely outperformed by its competitors according to all criteria, whereas the copula-based model with nonparametric marginals provides quite accurate point estimates but biased interval estimates of V.
Subjects
Box-Cox transformation
Copula regression
Fagus sylvatica
Normal quantile transformation
Uncertainty
Weighted regression
DDC Class
551: Geology, Hydrology Meteorology
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback