TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Simulations of granular flow in silos with different finite element programs: ANSYS vs. SILO
 
Options

Simulations of granular flow in silos with different finite element programs: ANSYS vs. SILO

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2010-05-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Gallego, Eutiquio  
Rombach, Günter Axel  
Neumann, Frank  
Ayuga, Francisco  
Institut
Massivbau B-7  
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/6811
Journal
Transactions of the ASABE  
Volume
53
Issue
3
Start Page
819
End Page
829
Citation
Transactions of the ASABE 3 (53): 819-829 (2010-05-01)
Publisher DOI
10.13031/2013.30065
Publisher
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
Great effort has been made to improve the knowledge about the behavior of granular material in silos. Nevertheless, many important aspects such as wall pressure, to which silo structures are subjected, still remain uncertain. Numerical simulations based on the finite element method have become a valuable tool to simulate the behavior of granular material in silos at rest and during their flow and to estimate the actions for which the structure has to be designed. However, great differences between various FE software packages have been observed. In this article, the results of two different FE software packages, the general-purpose software ANSYS and a special non-linear dynamic program called SILO, are compared, and the main problems of numerical simulations of granular flow in silos are discussed. Stresses of granular material are calculated during filling and discharge for two-and three-dimensional geometries, including different eccentricities of the outlet. Some numerical problems appear in both models when the bin is filled in several layers. Lateral pressures obtained with both models are similar for filling, but several differences may be observed during discharge. The ANSYS model presents some problems after short simulation discharge time, while the SILO model can simulate almost the entire process of discharge. © 2010 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Subjects
Discharge
Filling
Finite element analysis
Granular material
Silos
DDC Class
690: Hausbau, Bauhandwerk
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback