TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. The “sport” of rough contacts and the fractal paradox in wear laws
 
Options

The “sport” of rough contacts and the fractal paradox in wear laws

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2367
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2018
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Ciavarella, Michele  
Papangelo, Antonio 
Institut
Strukturdynamik M-14  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.2367
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/3074
Journal
Facta Universitatis  
Volume
16
Issue
1
Start Page
65
End Page
75
Citation
Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering 1 (16): 65-75 (2018)
Publisher DOI
10.22190/FUME180109011C
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85042076504
Publisher
Univ.
In a recent paper in Science, namely, “The Contact Sport of Rough Surfaces”, Carpick summarizes recent efforts in a “contact challenge” to predict in detail an elastic contact between the mathematically defined fractal rough surfaces under (very little) adhesion. He also suggests the next steps that are needed to “fulfill da Vinci’s dream of understanding what causes friction”. However, this is disappointing as friction has been studied since the times of Leonardo and in 500 years, no predictive model has emerged, nor any significant improvement from rough contact models. Similarly, a very large effort we have spent on the “sport” of studying rough surfaces has not made us any closer to being able to predict the coefficient of proportionality between wear loss and friction dissipation which was already observed by Reye in 1860. Recent nice simulations by Aghababaei, Warner and Molinari have confirmed the criterion for the formation of debris of a single particle, proposed in 1958 by Rabinowicz, as well as Reye’s assumption for the proportionality with frictional loss, which is very close to Archard anyway. More recent investigations under variable loads suggest that Reye’s assumption is probably much more general than Archard’s law. The attempts to obtain exact coefficients with rough surfaces models are very far from predictive, essentially because for fractals most authors fail to recognize that resolution-dependence of the contact area makes the models very ill-defined. We also suggest that in the models of wear, rough contacts should be considered “plastic” and “adhesive” and introduce a new length scale in the problem.
Subjects
Rough Contact
Fractals
Adhesive Wear
Reye’s Law
Archard’s Law
Rabinowicz’ Criterion
DDC Class
600: Technik
More Funding Information
DFG (German Research Foundation) for funding the project HO 3852/11-1.
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

3555-22553-2-PB.pdf

Size

564.81 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback