Options
Interprosthetic fractures of the femur
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2012-09-01
Sprache
English
Journal
Volume
14
Issue
3
Start Page
190
End Page
195
Citation
Trauma und Berufskrankheit 14 (3): 190-195 (2012)
Publisher DOI
Scopus ID
Publisher
Springer
The treatment of interprosthetic fractures is challenging and the incidence is increasing as a result of increasing patient longevity and rising arthroplasty rates. Interprosthetic fractures occur between arthroplasty stems or any intramedullary implant that has been implanted for fracture fixation. Management of these fractures is a complex undertaking. The majority of fractures are localized at the femoral supracondylar level after knee resurfacing arthroplasty. The fixation status of the arthroplasty component determines the management strategies. As a result of clinical and biomechanical studies, loosening of the implant usually requires revision arthroplasty, whereas minimally invasive reduction and locked internal fixation is the treatment of choice for stable implants. Minimally invasive surgery is necessary to not further compromise local perfusion. As locked plating provides superior biomechanical stability, the use of cerclage cables should be carefully evaluated. Complex fracture configurations, inferior bone stock or an intramedullary canal that is already occupied by support structures might obviate the implantation of long revision stems and might require a more extensive approach (e.g., total femoral arthroplasty). © Springer-Verlag 2011.
Subjects
Biomechanics
Bone plates
Femur
Interprosthetic fractures
Prosthesis replacement
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health