TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Comparative study of shell element formulations as NLFE parameters to forecast structural crashworthiness
 
Options

Comparative study of shell element formulations as NLFE parameters to forecast structural crashworthiness

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.8826
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2023-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Prabowo, Aditya Rio  
Ridwan, Ridwan
Braun, Moritz  orcid-logo
Konstruktion und Festigkeit von Schiffen M-10  
Song, Shi 
Konstruktion und Festigkeit von Schiffen M-10  
Ehlers, Sören  
Konstruktion und Festigkeit von Schiffen M-10  
Firdaus, Nurman
Adiputra, Ristiyanto  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.8826
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/44179
Journal
Curved and Layered Structures  
Volume
10
Issue
1
Article Number
20220217
Citation
Curved and Layered Structures 10 (1): 20220217 (2023-01)
Publisher DOI
10.1515/cls-2022-0217
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85175248529
This work made a comparison of the effects of selected element formulations (EFs) through nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA) and physical configurations in scenario design, particularly target locations. The combined results help in quantifying structural performance, focusing on crashworthiness criteria. The analysis involves nonlinear dynamic finite element methods, using an explicit approach applied to an idealized system. This system models ship-to-ship collisions, specifically the interaction between Ro and Ro and cargo reefer vessels, with one striking the other. Summarizing initial NLFEA results reveals that the chosen EF significantly influences the crashworthiness criteria. Notably, differences in formulations lead to different calculation times. The Belytschko-Tsay (BT) EF is the quickest, followed by the Belytschko-Leviathan (BL), with around a 36% difference. Conversely, formulations such as the Hughes-Liu involve much longer processing times, more than twice that of BT. To address the potential impact of shear locking and hourglassing on calculation accuracy during impact, the fully integrated (FI) version of the EF is used. It mitigates these undesired events. For formulations with the same approach, the FI BT formulation suppresses hourglassing effectively, unlike others that show orthogonal hourglassing increments. To ensure reliability, rules were set to assess hourglassing. The criterion is that the ratio of hourglass energy to internal energy should be ≤10%. All formulations meet this criterion and are suitable as geometric models in NLFEA. Regarding reliability and processing time, analyzing the computation time offers insights. Based on calculations, BL is the fastest, followed by Belytschko-Wong-Chiang, while the FI BT formulation takes more time for the same collision case.
Subjects
crashworthiness criteria
element formulation
nonlinear finite element analysis
ship-ship collision
structural performance
DDC Class
620: Engineering
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

10.1515_cls-2022-0217.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

4.55 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback