TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Current status of training environments in neuro-interventional practice: Are animal models still contemporary?
 
Options

Current status of training environments in neuro-interventional practice: Are animal models still contemporary?

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2019-03
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Nawka, Marie Teresa  
Fiehler, Jens  
Spallek, Johanna 
Buhk, Jan-Hendrik  
Frölich, Andreas M. J.  
Institut
Produktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik M-17  
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/10868
Journal
Journal of neuroInterventional surgery  
Volume
11
Issue
3
Start Page
283
End Page
289
Citation
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 11 (3): 283-289 (2019)
Publisher DOI
10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014036
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85050973213
PubMed ID
30049799
Purpose Several different training environments for practicing neurointerventional procedures have been realized in silico, in vitro, and in vivo. We seek to replace animal-based training with suitable alternatives. In an effort to determine present training model distribution and preferences, we interviewed interventional neuroradiologists from 25 different countries about their experience in distinct training environments. Methods A voluntary online survey comprising 24 questions concerning the different training facilities was designed and electronically conducted with the members of the European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy. Results Seventy-one physicians with an average experience of 11.8 (±8.7) years completed the survey. The majority of participants had experience with animal-based training (eg, stroke intervention: 36; 50.7%). Overall, animal-based training was rated as the most suitable environment to practice coil embolization (20 (±6)), flow diverter placement (13 (±7)), and stroke intervention (13.5 (±9)). In-vitro training before using a new device in patients was supported by most participants (35; 49.3%). Additionally, preference for certain training models was related to the years of experience. Conclusion This survey discloses the preferred training modalities in European neurointerventional centers with the majority of physicians supporting the general concept of in-vitro training, concomitantly lacking a standardized curriculum for educating neurointerventional physicians. Most suitable training modalities appeared to be dependent on procedure and experience. As animal-based training is still common, alternate artificial environments meeting these demands must be further developed.
Subjects
aneurysm
angiography
intervention
standards
DDC Class
600: Technology
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback