TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Characterization of a microelectromechanical systems-based counter-current flame ionization detector
 
Options

Characterization of a microelectromechanical systems-based counter-current flame ionization detector

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2011
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Kuipers, Winfred  
Mikrosystemtechnik E-7  
Müller, Jörg  
Mikrosystemtechnik E-7  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/43945
Journal
Journal of chromatography A  
Volume
1218
Issue
14
Start Page
1891
End Page
1898
Citation
Journal of Chromatography A 1218 (14): 1891-1898 (2011)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.084
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-79952627538
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1873-3778
This work is concerned with the influence of different operating parameters on the response of a counter-current micro flame ionization detector (cc-μFID) with low gas consumption for mobile applications. At cc-μFID flow rates (<10ml/min hydrogen), the response depends mainly on the oxygen flow. At 7.5ml/min hydrogen flow, highest sensitivity (13.7mC/gC) is obtained with the smallest flame chamber and nozzle size, moderate sample gas flow (2.0ml/min), and an oxygen flow above stoichiometry (9.4ml/min, λ=2.5). The largest absolute signal is obtained at increased sample gas flow (8.0ml/min). However, to prevent parting of the micro-flame by the sample gas stream, largest nozzles (smallest outflow velocity) give the best result (4.37nA). Whereas cc-μFID sensitivity is comparable with conventional FID sensitivity, peak-to-peak noise of 1pA is relatively large. Therefore, the minimum detectable carbon mass flow of 1.46×10-10gC/s and the minimum detectable methane concentration of 3.43ppm are larger than typical FID detection limits. μGC-μFID experiments show the difference between premixing the sample with the hydrogen or with the oxygen with respect to sensitivity and response factors. Sensitivity is decreased considerably when the column effluent is added to the oxygen instead of to the hydrogen. For hydrogen premixed samples the response factor to butane can be increased up to 0.81 (methane=1), whereas for oxygen premixed samples it is maximally 0.31. This smaller sensitivity to oxygen premixed samples and the larger variation of response factors shows the importance of the hydrogen atom during breakdown of organic molecules to single-carbon fragments before ionization.
Subjects
FID response mechanism
MEMS
Micro flame ionization detector
Micro gas chromatography
Microsystems technology
Total hydrocarbon analysis
DDC Class
620: Engineering
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback