Options
OC6 project Phase IV : validation of numerical models for novel floating offshore wind support structures
Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.9553
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Publikationsdatum
2024-04-29
Sprache
English
Author
National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Brun, Cédric
Pineau, Jean-Philippe
Turbine Engineering, DNV, Bristol, UK
Department of Wind and Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
National Hydraulics and Environment Laboratory (LNHE), EDF R&D, Chatou, France
National Hydraulics and Environment Laboratory (LNHE), EDF R&D, Chatou, France
Gavin&Doherty Geosolutions Ltd., Dublin, Ireland
Gavin&Doherty Geosolutions Ltd., Dublin, Ireland
Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway
Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN), Wageningen, Netherlands
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Floating Offshore Group, PRINCIPIA, La Ciotat, France
Power and Technology Department, Shell International Exploration and Production, Houston, TX, USA
Department of Offshore Wind, Wood Group Kenny, Galway, Ireland
University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
Enthalten in
Volume
9
Issue
4
Start Page
1025
End Page
1051
Citation
Wind Energy Science 9 (4): 1025-1051 (2024)
Publisher DOI
Scopus ID
Publisher
Copernicus Publications
This paper provides a summary of the work done within Phase IV of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued with Correlation and unCertainty (OC6) project, under International Energy Agency Wind Technology Collaboration Programme Task 30. This phase focused on validating the loading on and motion of a novel floating offshore wind system. Numerical models of a 3.6MW horizontal-axis wind turbine atop the TetraSpar floating support structure were compared using measurement data from a 1 V 43-Froude-scale test performed in the University of Maine’s AlfondWind–Wave (W2) Ocean Engineering Laboratory. Participants in the project ran a series of simulations, including system equilibrium, surge offsets, free-decay tests, wind-only conditions, wave-only conditions, and a combination of wind and wave conditions. Validation of the models was performed by comparing the aerodynamic loading, floating support structure motion, tower base loading,mooring line tensions, and keel line tensions. The results show a relatively good estimation of the aerodynamic loading and a reasonable estimation of the platform motion and tower base fore–aft bending moment. However, there is a significant dispersion in the dynamic loading for the upwind mooring line. Very good agreement was observed between most of the numerical models and the experiment for the keel line tensions.
DDC Class
620: Engineering
More Funding Information
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024.pdf
Type
main article
Size
3.28 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-f17.png
Size
74.78 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-f06.png
Size
147.22 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-f10.png
Size
176.49 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-t05.png
Size
189.6 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-t03.png
Size
286.13 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-f05.png
Size
72.21 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-f18.png
Size
186.74 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-t07.png
Size
555.49 KB
Format
PNG
Loading...
Name
wes-9-1025-2024-f07.png
Size
76.88 KB
Format
PNG