TUHH Open Research
Help
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Publications
Research Data
People
Institutions
Projects
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Publication References
  4. Unexpected Interruptions, Idle Time, and Creativity: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Unexpected Interruptions, Idle Time, and Creativity: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2024-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Schweisfurth, Tim
Greul, Anne
Institut
Organizational Design and Collaboration Engineering W-13
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/15002
Journal
Organization science
Volume
35
Issue
1
Citation
Organization Science 35 (1): (2024)
Publisher DOI
10.1287/orsc.2023.1660
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85173948497
Interruptions are common in organizational life and last from seconds and minutes to hours and days. We rely on a quantitative abductive strategy to determine how extended work interruptions shape employees’ creativity. We start by studying how surprising interruptions that cause idle time affect employees’ creative performance. We do so by exploiting a natural experiment—a supply chain shortage that caused unexpected stops in production plants—to show that individuals exposed to such an interruption produce 58% more ideas than uninterrupted employees in the three weeks after the interruption. We corroborate this effect in a replication and extend it to idea quality. Investigating the effect’s causes, we then show that we do not find the same effects for two other interruption types: for unexpected interruptions without idle time (i.e., intrusions), we find a negative effect on creative performance because employees forcefully disengage from their work and switch their attention to the interrupting task. For expected interruptions with idle time (i.e., planned breaks), we also find no positive effect on creative performance because employees discretionally disengage from work and focus on nonwork and leisure goals. We consider and evaluate three different theoretical explanations for our findings: attention residue, cognitive stimulation, and recovery. We end our abductive process by putting attention residue forward as the most likely explanation. Finally, we suggest three propositions based on our findings and discuss our contributions to the literature on interruptions and creativity in organizations.
DDC Class
600: Technology
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback