TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Sliced online model checking for optimizing the beam scheduling problem in robotic radiation therapy
 
Options

Sliced online model checking for optimizing the beam scheduling problem in robotic radiation therapy

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.9528
Publikationstyp
Conference Paper
Date Issued
2024
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Beckers, Lars  
Softwaresysteme E-16  
Gerlach, Stefan  orcid-logo
Medizintechnische und Intelligente Systeme E-1  
Lübke, Ole  orcid-logo
Softwaresysteme E-16  
Schlaefer, Alexander  
Medizintechnische und Intelligente Systeme E-1  
Schupp, Sibylle  
Softwaresysteme E-16  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.9528
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/47310
Journal
Electronic proceedings in theoretical computer science  
Volume
399
Start Page
193
End Page
209
Citation
6th Workshop on Models for Formal Analysis of Real Systems, MARS 2024
Contribution to Conference
6th Workshop on Models for Formal Analysis of Real Systems, MARS 2024  
Publisher DOI
10.4204/EPTCS.399.9
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85190255959
ArXiv ID
2403.18918v1
Publisher
NICTA
In robotic radiation therapy, high-energy photon beams from different directions are directed at a target within the patient. Target motion can be tracked by robotic ultrasound and then compensated by synchronous beam motion. However, moving the beams may result in beams passing through the ultrasound transducer or the robot carrying it. While this can be avoided by pausing the beam delivery, the treatment time would increase. Typically, the beams are delivered in an order which minimizes the robot motion and thereby the overall treatment time. However, this order can be changed, i.e., instead of pausing beams, other feasible beam could be delivered. We address this problem of dynamically ordering the beams by applying a model checking paradigm to select feasible beams. Since breathing patterns are complex and change rapidly, any offline model would be too imprecise. Thus, model checking must be conducted online, predicting the patient's current breathing pattern for a short amount of time and checking which beams can be delivered safely. Monitoring the treatment delivery online provides the option to reschedule beams dynamically in order to avoid pausing and hence to reduce treatment time. While human breathing patterns are complex and may change rapidly, we need a model which can be verified quickly and use approximation by a superposition of sine curves. Further, we simplify the 3D breathing motion into separate 1D models. We compensate the simplification by adding noise inside the model itself. In turn, we synchronize between the multiple models representing the different spatial directions, the treatment simulation, and corresponding verification queries. Our preliminary results show a 16.02 % to 37.21 % mean improvement on the idle time compared to a static beam schedule, depending on an additional safety margin. Note that an additional safety margin around the ultrasound robot can decrease idle times but also compromises plan quality by limiting the range of available beam directions. In contrast, the approach using online model checking maintains the plan quality. Further, we compare to a naive machine learning approach that does not achieve its goals while being harder to reason about.
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
004: Computer Sciences
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

2403.18918v1.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

1.41 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback