TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Optimising geometries of drag embedment anchors for floating offshore structures using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
 
Options

Optimising geometries of drag embedment anchors for floating offshore structures using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.17319
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2026-04-23
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Dao, D. A.  orcid-logo
Geotechnik und Baubetrieb B-5  
Chmelnizkij, A.  
Digitales und autonomes Bauen B-1  
Cerek, K.  orcid-logo
Geotechnik und Baubetrieb B-5  
Hadjiloo, E.  orcid-logo
Geotechnik und Baubetrieb B-5  
Grabe, J.  
Geotechnik und Baubetrieb B-5  
Smarsly, K.  
Digitales und autonomes Bauen B-1  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.17319
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/63499
Journal
International journal of naval architecture and ocean engineering  
Volume
18
Article Number
100766
Citation
International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 18: 100766 (2026)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2026.100766
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105041282500
Publisher
Elsevier
Floating offshore renewable energy systems rely on secure anchoring, e.g. drag embedment anchors (DEAs). DEA design involves balancing multiple objectives and considering various geometric parameters. Although multi-objective optimisation packages are widely available, DEA optimisation is still frequently handled heuristically. This study introduces a workflow that couples established semi-analytical DEA kinematics in MATLAB with multi-objective evolutionary optimisation (gamultiobj, based on NSGA-II) to identify anchor geometries that minimise anchor volume while maximising bearing capacity and penetration depth. Radar charts and the visualisation of the Pareto front across the design space provide interpretable structures that are not directly apparent from the governing equations alone. Three case studies are presented. The first identifies Pareto-optimal fluke and shank lengths and examines the influence of the boundary on the solutions. The second expands the design space to include fluke thickness, junction length, and fluke–shank angle. Clustering of Pareto solutions reveals three consistent geometric groups: (i) generally large anchors with small junctions, (ii) anchors with larger junctions and variable proportions, and (iii) anchors with broad flukes. A high fluke-shank angle is consistently present across all groups and appears beneficial for all objectives. The third case applies a weighted-sum formulation to produce a single design. Overall, this study provides a workflow for optimisation-driven exploration of DEA design, including a classification of Pareto-optimal geometries that offers a compact way to assess trade-offs from concept to sizing.
Subjects
Drag embedment anchors (DEAs)
Floating structures
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
Offshore renewables
Optimisation
DDC Class
519: Applied Mathematics, Probabilities
624.15: Geotechnical Engineering
Funding(s)
GR 1024/61-1
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S2092678226000300-main.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

4.82 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback