TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Accounting for extremes in modeling the size and likelihood of large fires in the United States
 
Options

Accounting for extremes in modeling the size and likelihood of large fires in the United States

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.17218
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2026-05-12
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Asadian, Amirali  
Zaerpour, Masoud  
Papalexiou, Simon  
Global Water Security B-2  
AghaKouchak, Amir  
Vahedifard, Farshid  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.17218
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/63274
Journal
Earth's future  
Volume
14
Issue
5
Article Number
e2025EF007485
Citation
Earth S Future 14 (5): e2025EF007485 (2026)
Publisher DOI
10.1029/2025EF007485
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105038598566
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Wildfires pose growing threats to ecosystems, infrastructure, and communities, yet fire size distributions are often modeled without sufficient attention to rare, high-impact events. Most statistical approaches emphasize the central body of the distribution, which can obscure the behavior of extreme wildfires (i.e., tail events) that have the most significant impact. Here, we introduce a framework that explicitly distinguishes between the statistical characteristics of body and tail fire size distributions. We analyzed 30,331 large fire perimeters from the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) data set (1984–2024), disaggregated across 105 Level III ecoregions and 10 Geographic Area Coordination Centers (GACCs) across the United States. For each region, we fit three candidate distributions (Pareto Type II, lognormal, Weibull) to both the full data set and an exceedance-based tail sample. Results show that models calibrated only to the body can substantially misestimate the exceedance probability (by up to three orders of magnitude) and burned area (by hundreds of thousands of acres) for large fires. For the body of the distribution, the lognormal and Pareto Type II distributions generally outperform the Weibull. For the tail, the picture is more nuanced: the Pareto Type II and lognormal perform comparably at the ecoregion level, while the Weibull, despite being the weakest body model, provides the best tail fit at the GACC scale. These findings highlight the need to model body and tail behavior separately and show that optimal distributions vary across scales, underscoring the importance of region-specific tail models for suppression budgeting, fuel treatment, and resilience planning.
Subjects
annual-exceedance tail
extreme value analysis
GACC regions
heavy-tailed distributions
large fires
risk assessment
statistical distribution
wildfires
DDC Class
363.7: Environmental Problems
630: Agriculture and Related Technologies
551: Geology, Hydrology Meteorology
519: Applied Mathematics, Probabilities
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Earth s Future - 2026 - Asadian - Accounting for Extremes in Modeling the Size and Likelihood of Large Fires in the United.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

3.04 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback