TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Practice reflections within a workshop: supervising students' scientific reading in thesis writing in times of Artificial Intelligence
 
Options

Practice reflections within a workshop: supervising students' scientific reading in thesis writing in times of Artificial Intelligence

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.16838
Publikationstyp
Conference Paper
Date Issued
2025
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Bulmann, Ulrike  
Zentrum für Lehre und Lernen ZLL  
Stahlberg, Nadine  
Zentrum für Lehre und Lernen ZLL  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.16838
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/61940
Start Page
1167
End Page
1176
Citation
53rd Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering: Educating Responsible Engineers, SEFI 2025
Contribution to Conference
53rd Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering: Educating Responsible Engineers, SEFI 2025  
Publisher DOI
10.5281/zenodo.17631323
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105031562491
ISBN of container
978-2-87352-029-8
To reflectively supervise students in final theses along the research process is very much under pressure in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). Being inspired by TL;DRs (abbreviation for «too long; didn't read», automatically generated hyper-short paper summaries), we emphasize in this article on the rather unattentive aspect of reading competences within the intertwinned reading – writing – researching – critical thinking approach. We asked: ''How can academics support students' reading competences when supervising them in their final theses in the age of AI?'' Thus, we encouraged reflection in a workshop for 17 supervisors by using (1) a self-designed, survey consisting of three parts: reflection, exercise and transfer, and (2) a peer exchange. Supervisors' reflections showed that they read scientific articles with joy, less time and rely on traditional reading strategies rather than using AI tools for reading. Being unaware of TL;DRs first, an exercise on writing and generating a hyper-short summary using a university's HAWKI-based LLM led them to evaluate the text quality to be both promising and risky. This resulted in assessing their training of competences to be multifaceted. Together, they updated their supervision guidelines considering multiple deskilling risks and various competence development potentials for students when using AI or not. Finally, we argue that such practical reflections and peer dicussions raise supervisors' awareness for responsible guidance of students in their final theses (best earlier within the curriculum) to strengthen their critical and AI literacy in an AI-enriched learning environment.
DDC Class
378.1: Organization and Management; Curriculums
371.3: Methods of instruction and study
006.3: Artificial Intelligence
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

SEFI2025_034.pdf

Size

369.38 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback