Options
A general procedure to identify indicators for evaluation and monitoring of nature-based solution projects
Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4453
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Publikationsdatum
2022-11
Sprache
English
Author
Rödl, Anne
Enthalten in
Volume
51
Issue
11
Start Page
2278
End Page
2293
Citation
Ambio 51 (11): 2278-2293 (2022-11)
Publisher DOI
Scopus ID
Publisher
Springer
In the last years, the idea of using natural elements or nature-based solutions (NbS) to mitigate the impacts of cities on climate, biodiversity and citizens' health became more popular in research and practice. Nevertheless, there are currently uncertainties in finding and selecting appropriate criteria and indicators for monitoring and evaluating the impact and performance of NbS and its co-creation processes. This paper proposes an easy-to-use and structured procedure for selecting appropriate criteria and indicators for monitoring and evaluating any kind of NbS project. The user is guided step by step in selecting meaningful metrics. The procedure is tested using a real case study from the Horizon 2020 research project CLEVER Cities as an example. The test shows that by following the indicated procedure, the criteria and indicator selection process is speeded up and reproducible.
Schlagworte
Co-creation
Decision-making
Evaluation
Indicator selection
Monitoring
Nature-based solutions
DDC Class
570: Biowissenschaften, Biologie
600: Technik
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
710: Landschaftsgestaltung, Raumplanung
More Funding Information
Open access funding was provided by Projekt DEAL.
Publication version
acceptedVersion
Loading...
Name
ROEDL_ARLATI_monitoringFramework_ambio.pdf
Size
1.65 MB
Format
Adobe PDF