TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Comparative analysis of local trajectory planning algorithms in ROS2
 
Options

Comparative analysis of local trajectory planning algorithms in ROS2

Publikationstyp
Conference Paper
Date Issued
2025-04
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Elbouhy, Seifalla Mohamed
Technische Logistik W-6  
Adamanov, Asan 
Technische Logistik W-6  
Braun, Philipp Maximilian  orcid-logo
Technische Logistik W-6  
Rose, Hendrik Wilhelm 
Technische Logistik W-6  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/55770
Start Page
1
End Page
6
Citation
IEEE International Conference on Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots, SIMPAR 2025
Contribution to Conference
IEEE International Conference on Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots, SIMPAR 2025  
Publisher DOI
10.1109/SIMPAR62925.2025.10979015
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105005023624
Publisher
IEEE
ISBN of container
979-8-3315-1685-7
Local path planners are essential for real-time obstacle avoidance, particularly in unpredictable industrial environments. This study compares three ROS 2 local path-planning algorithms: Dynamic Window Approach (DWB), Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI), and Regulated Pure Pursuit (RPP). These planners are part of the Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2) navigation stack (Nav2), with DWB and MPPI as built-in controllers, and RPP integrated as a controller option.While previous studies have focused on simulations or simple real-world environments with static obstacles, few have examined dynamic and unpredictable scenarios. To address this, experiments were conducted with a Clearpath Jackal robot in environments with static and dynamic obstacles. Key metrics, including distance to obstacles, frequency of recovery behaviors, and path smoothness, were used to compare the planners performance in both real-world and simulated settings.MPPI offers a strong balance across all metrics, making it ideal for dynamic environments requiring both safety and efficiency. DWB excels in fast navigation, though with closer proximity to obstacles, while RPP produces smooth paths but struggles in highly dynamic environments. These results provide valuable insights for selecting the right local path planner for autonomous robots in industrial applications like manufacturing and warehousing.
Subjects
DWB
Local Planner
MPPI
ROS2
RPP
DDC Class
600: Technology
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback