TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Validation of a panel method with full-scale FOWT measurements and verification with engineering models
 
Options

Validation of a panel method with full-scale FOWT measurements and verification with engineering models

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.8967
Publikationstyp
Conference Paper
Date Issued
2023-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Netzband, Stefan  
Fluiddynamik und Schiffstheorie M-8  
Schulz, Christian  orcid-logo
Fluiddynamik und Schiffstheorie M-8  
Özinan, Umut
Adam, Raphaël
Choisnet, Thomas
Cheng, Po Wen  
Abdel-Maksoud, Moustafa  orcid-logo
Fluiddynamik und Schiffstheorie M-8  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.8967
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/44742
Journal
Journal of physics. Conference Series  
Volume
2626
Issue
1
Article Number
012061
Citation
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2626: 012061 (2023-11-06)
Contribution to Conference
20th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R and D Conference, DeepWind 2023  
Publisher DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/2626/1/012061
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85179549732
Publisher
IOP Publ.
The present paper gives insights into the verification of different models of the Floatgen demonstrator by BW Ideol. This floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) is based on a barge type-floater with moonpool. The moonpool shall dampen the platform's motion and is challenging to model due to the increased complexity of the hydrodynamic behaviour. For the verification purposes, the results of two engineering methods (OrcaFlex, OpenFAST) equipped with frequency-dependent hydrodynamic solver and the nonlinear time-domain boundary element method panMARE are compared. The OrcaFlex model designed by BW Ideol is regarded as a reference because of a preceding calibration with measurement data. All models show fairly good agreement in most cases. Only in heave there are significant differences between engineering and the nonlinear models which is caused by different modelling of the moonpool hydrodynamics. In addition, a hybrid simulation approach with prescribed motion and constrained wind field based on motion sensors and LIDAR measurements on the Floatgen demonstrator was applied for an aerodynamic and load validation of panMARE. The validation shows good agreement based on time-domain comparison regarding the tower top loads and turbine operation.
DDC Class
620: Engineering
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Netzband_2023_J._Phys. _Conf._Ser._2626_012061.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

2.34 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback