TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. How does the collar in cementless hip stems work? Comparison of the strain distribution in the cortex of the proximal femur
 
Options

How does the collar in cementless hip stems work? Comparison of the strain distribution in the cortex of the proximal femur

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.15953
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2025-12-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Brand, Katja  
Biomechanik M-3  
Dakhili, Golzar
Biomechanik M-3  
Lampe, Frank  
Ondruschka, Benjamin  
Morlock, Michael  
Biomechanik M-3  
Huber, Gerd  
Biomechanik M-3  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.15953
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/57803
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Journal
Clinical biomechanics  
Volume
130
Article Number
106671
Citation
Clinical Biomechanics 130: 106671 (2025)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106671
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105016315557
Publisher
Elsevier
Background: Collared cementless hip stems have demonstrated a reduced incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures compared to collarless counterparts. Many fractures occur during implantation, when collarless stems are seated to achieve press-fit, causing critical tensile strains in the femur. Collared stems can limit excessive seating and subsidence through calcar-collar contact. This study aimed to explain the clinically observed smaller fracture rates with collared stems by comparing strain distributions during implantation and loading between collared and collarless stems. It was hypothesized that collared stems distribute applied forces through both the collar and stem, increasing compressive axial and shear strains, allowing higher load tolerance. Methods: Seven collared and seven collarless stems were implanted with constant velocity (0.1 mm/s) in porcine femurs until failure. Two human cadaveric femurs were tested as proof of concept. Shear, axial compressive and tangential tensile strains were compared alongside fracture patterns, subsidence and forces. Findings: Collared stems in porcine femurs resisted approximately twice as much force until failure occurred (collared: 4187 N, collarless: 1980 N; p < 0.001), with similar tangential tensile strains (1 % to 1.4 % p = 0.805) and subsidence of 1.6 mm for collarless and 1.1 mm for collared stems at different failure forces (p = 0.288). Axial compressive strain was heavily increased by 1147 % with collared stems (collared: 1.2 %, collarless: 0.1 %; p = 0.026). Human femurs exhibited similar trends. Interpretation: During loading, the collar prevents periprosthetic femoral fractures by increasing axial compressive strains instead of causing critical excessive tangential tensile strains (hoop strains) that can result in fractures.
Subjects
Cementless
Collar
Implantation process
Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture
Strain measurement
Total hip arthroplasty
DDC Class
617: Surgery, Regional Medicine, Dentistry, Ophthalmology, Otology, Audiology
610: Medicine, Health
Funding(s)
Projekt DEAL  
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S026800332500244X-main.pdf

Size

6.92 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback