TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. The water jet as a new tool for endoprosthesis revision surgery : an in vitro study on human bone and bone cement
 
Options

The water jet as a new tool for endoprosthesis revision surgery : an in vitro study on human bone and bone cement

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2003-12-30
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Honl, Matthias  
Biomechanik M-3  
Rentzsch, Reemt
Schwieger, Karsten  
Carrero, Volker  
Dierk, Oliver
Dries, Sebastian Peter Michael  
Louis, Hartmut
Pude, Frank
Bishop, Nicholas  
Biomechanik M-3  
Hille, Ekkehard  
Morlock, Michael  
Biomechanik M-3  
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/46662
Journal
Bio-medical materials and engineering  
Volume
13
Issue
4
Start Page
317
End Page
325
Citation
Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 13 (4): 317-325 (2003)
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-10744229676
Publisher
IOS Press
In revision surgeries of endoprostheses, the interface between implant and bone cement or bone must be loosened. Conventional tools have many disadvantages because of their size and limited range. Taking advantage of the selective and athermic cutting process, a plain water jet is already used in order to cut soft tissues. This study investigates the possibilities of both a plain and an abrasive water jet as cutting tools for revision surgery. Samples of the mid-diaphysis of human femora and bone cement (CMW3) were cut with a plain water jet (PWJ) and an abrasive water jet (AWJ) at two different jet-to-surface angles (30°, 90°) and at five different pressure levels (30, 40, 50, 60, 70 MPa). For a PWJ a selective pressure range was identified, where only bone cement was cut. Injecting a bio-compatible abrasive (lactose) to the jet stream resulted in significantly higher cut depths in both materials. Material removal in bone was significantly less at the smaller jet-to-surface angle for both techniques. No clear selectivity between bone and bone cement was observed for application of the AWJ. However, the material removal rate was significantly higher for bone cement than for bone at all pressure levels. The results indicate that an AWJ might be an alternative tool for cement removal. The possibility for localised cutting at interfaces could be an advantage for revision of a non-cemented prosthesis.
Subjects
Bone
Bone cement
Jet cutting
Prosthesis
Revision
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
620: Engineering
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback