TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Fluted stem designs enhance surgical precision and primary stability in cementless revision hip arthroplasty – a cadaver study
 
Options

Fluted stem designs enhance surgical precision and primary stability in cementless revision hip arthroplasty – a cadaver study

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.16281
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2025-11-27
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Boettcher, Julius M.  
Biomechanik M-3  
Sellenschloh, Kay  
Biomechanik M-3  
Pardos, Ana Cruz  
Huber, Gerd  
Biomechanik M-3  
Ondruschka, Benjamin  
Morlock, Michael  
Biomechanik M-3  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.16281
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/59545
Journal
Clinical biomechanics  
Volume
131
Article Number
106723
Citation
Clinical Biomechanics 131: 106723 (2026)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106723
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105023082183
Publisher
Elsevier
Background: Cortical contact of the stem is a key determinant for primary stability in cementless revision hip arthroplasty. This matched-pair cadaveric study evaluated whether implant designs that increase cortical contact improve primary fixation of cementless revision stems Methods: Ten paired femora received either a tapered monoblock RECLAIM™ stem with advanced spline (RAS) geometry or an identically sized prototype solid stem. Axial seating and rotation were recorded using dynamic image correlation during implantation. Specimens were cyclically loaded up to 200 % body weight, after which torque-to-failure was measured Findings: Both designs showed mean micromotion <50 μm during cyclic loading, consistently favourable for osseointegration. However, solid stems rotated more during implantation than RAS stems (3.6 ± 5.0° vs. 0.5 ± 0.6°, p = 0.088). The cortical contact area of the solid stems was 43.6 % larger than RAS stems (p < 0.001) without an impact on superior fixation: Axial subsidence and rotation during cyclic loading did not differ significantly between the designs but two solid-stem specimens fractured under high loading. Torque-to-failure of the RAS stems was 38.7 ± 7.5 nm, exceeding that of solid stems by 24.3 % (p = 0.032) Interpretation: These findings suggest that maximising circumferential contact by implant design alone cannot compensate for irregularities of the femoral canal. Whereas solid stems wedge firmly only at the cost of positioning accuracy and increased fracture risk, the thin splines of the RAS design engage the cortex progressively, guide the implant to the planned depth, and augment torsional resistance without excessive press-fit. Tapered stems with cortex-indenting splines improve primary stability in cementless revision hip arthroplasty more effectively than increasing contact area alone.
Subjects
Biomechanical cadaver study
Cementless revision hip arthroplasty
Hip revision stem
Implant design
In-vitro experiment
Primary stability
DDC Class
617: Surgery, Regional Medicine, Dentistry, Ophthalmology, Otology, Audiology
620.1: Engineering Mechanics and Materials Science
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S0268003325002967-main.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

5.5 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback