TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. A quantitative comparison of electrode positions for respiratory surface EMG
 
Options

A quantitative comparison of electrode positions for respiratory surface EMG

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.14948
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2025-02-18
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Oltmann, Andra  
Graßhoff, Jan  
Lange, Nils
Knopp, Tobias  
Biomedizinische Bildgebung E-5  
Rostalski, Philipp  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.14948
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/54897
Journal
IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering  
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (in Press): (2025)
Publisher DOI
10.1109/TBME.2025.3543644
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85218767641
Publisher
IEEE
Objective: Respiratory surface electromyography (sEMG) is a promising physiological signal for analyzing respiratory effort, patient-ventilator asynchrony, and respiratory training. In clinical research, a wide variety of different setups are used and no consensus has yet been reached on the positioning of electrodes. Therefore, this work aims to quantitatively compare both unilateral and bilateral bipolar electrode leads. Methods: Recordings of diaphragmatic and intercostal muscle activity were performed in 20 young and healthy adults using a setup with 64 electrodes placed in relation to prominent anatomical lines. Subjects completed three breathing maneuvers: 300 s quiet breathing, 5 maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) trials, and 15 breaths of resistance breathing at 20 % of the MIP. To quantify the performance of differential electrode leads, three metrics were determined: the ratio between inspiratory muscle activity and (1) baseline noise (SNRbase), (2) expiratory muscle activity (SNRexp), and (3) ECG interference (SNREMG-ECG). Results: The study revealed considerable differences between bipolar electrode positions. Our results support the use of bilateral positions on the midclavicular line and parasternal line for measuring diaphragm and intercostal activity. For intercostal muscles, there is a high flexibility in positioning electrodes more lateral or medial, if necessary. Unilateral leads do not appear to outperform the bilateral configuration as SNR metrics were consistently smaller. Conclusion: This study provides recommendations for electrode placements and is a first step towards standardization of respiratory sEMG measurements. Significance: This electrode lead standardization will be essential to increase clinical acceptance in the future.
Subjects
electrode positioning | respiratory muscles | surface electromyography
DDC Class
610: Medicine, Health
617.9: Operative Surgery and Special Fields of Surgery
621.38: Electronics, Communications Engineering
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

A_Quantitative_Comparison_of_Electrode_Positions_for_Respiratory_Surface_EMG.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

1.82 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback