TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Organizing entrepreneurial teams: A field experiment on autonomy over choosing teams and ideas
 
Options

Organizing entrepreneurial teams: A field experiment on autonomy over choosing teams and ideas

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.9055
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2023-11
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Boss, Viktoria  
Unternehmertum W-11  
Dahlander, Linus
Ihl, Christoph  
Unternehmertum W-11  
Jayaraman, Rajshri
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.9055
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/45116
Journal
Organization science  
Volume
34
Issue
6
Start Page
2097
End Page
2118
Citation
Organization Science 34 (6): 2097-2118 (2023-11)
Publisher DOI
10.1287/orsc.2021.1520
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85180940275
Publisher
INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences
ISSN
10477039
Scholars have suggested that autonomy can lead to better entrepreneurial team performance. Yet, there are different types of autonomy, and they come at a cost. We shed light on whether two fundamental organizational design choices—granting teams autonomy to (1) choose project ideas to work on and (2) choose team members to work with—affect performance. We run a field experiment involving 939 students in a lean startup entrepreneurship course over 11 weeks. The aim is to disentangle the separate and joint effects of granting autonomy over choosing teams and choosing ideas compared with a baseline treatment with preassigned ideas and team members. We find that teams with autonomy over choosing either ideas or team members outperform teams in the baseline treatment as measured by pitch deck performance. The effect of choosing ideas is significantly stronger than the effect of choosing teams. However, the performance gains vanish for teams that are granted full autonomy over choosing both ideas and teams. This suggests the two forms of autonomy are substitutes. Causal mediation analysis reveals that the main effects of choosing ideas or teams can be partly explained by a better match of ideas with team members’ interests and prior network contacts among team members, respectively. Although homophily and lack of team diversity cannot explain the performance drop among teams with full autonomy, our results suggest that self-selected teams fall prey to overconfidence and complacency too early to fully exploit the potential of their chosen idea. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on organizational design, autonomy, and innovation.
Subjects
autonomy
entrepreneurial performance
field experiment
ideas
teams
DDC Class
330: Economics
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

boss-et-al-2021-organizing-entrepreneurial-teams-a-field-experiment-on-autonomy-over-choosing-teams-and-ideas.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

1.12 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback