TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables
 
Options

Dynamic simulation and comparison of different configurations for a coupled energy system with 100% renewables

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2087
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2018-11-27
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Bode, Carsten  
Schmitz, Gerhard  
Institut
Technische Thermodynamik M-21  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.2087
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2091
Journal
Energy procedia  
Volume
155
Start Page
412
End Page
430
Citation
Energy Procedia (155): 412-430 (2018-01-01)
Contribution to Conference
12th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, IRES 2018  
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.037
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85058225643
Publisher
Elsevier
For the successful transition to a renewable energy source powered society, coupling of different energy sectors is inevitable. The extreme case of a future German energy system consisting of power, heat and gas consumers supplied with 100% renewables is analyzed here. To find the most cost-effective system configuration, different combinations of storage and conversion technologies are compared by performing dynamic simulations and evaluating the average costs over the period of one year. Renewable power production is modeled by using actual power-generation curves and extrapolating the installed power for each technology according to the German energy system framework. Final energy curves for power, heat and gas demand are created as a result of the study. The gas demand only arises from industries using hydrocarbons as a product in processes and for high temperature process heat. The components of the energy system, e.g. storage and conversion technologies are modeled using the equation-based open-source TransiEnt Library based on Modelica®. To obtain the boundaries of the solution scope, the comparison is started by analyzing homogeneous scenarios, e.g. All-Electric or All-Gas with Power-to-Gas with reconversion to power and heat. To find the optimal configuration within this scope, different combinations of power (adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES), lithium-ion battery, pumped hydro storage), heat storage (hot water storage) and gas storage (underground storage) technologies as well as conversion technologies, i.e. Power-to- Gas (electrolyzer with methanation), Power-to-Heat (electric heat pump, electric boiler), Gas-to-Heat (gas boiler, gas heat pump), and Gas-to-Power (gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbine) are simulated. The results show that a homogeneous energy system configuration where all services are supplied by either power or gas are technically possible but not economic. Due to the limited technical potential of renewables, ecological feasibility of All-Gas systems is limited. A combination of Power-to-Gas with combined cycle gas turbines, electric heat pumps, a lithium-ion battery and pumped hydro storage is the option with the lowest cost. Using an A-CAES instead of the battery or adding an A-CAES to the battery does not lower the cost.
Subjects
Coupled Energy System
Dynamic Simulation
100 % Renewables
Cost Optimization
DDC Class
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
Funding(s)
Resilienz gekoppelter Energienetze mit hohem Anteil erneuerbarer Energien  
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S1876610218309846-main.pdf

Size

1.32 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback