Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Publisher DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1950602
Title: Concept of climate-charged airspaces: a potential policy instrument for internalizing aviation's climate impact of non-CO2 effects
Language: English
Authors: Niklaß, Malte 
Grewe, Volker 
Gollnick, Volker 
Dahlmann, Katrin 
Keywords: aviation emissions; climate change mitigation; cost-benefit analysis; non- effects; trajectory optimization; Transport policy
Issue Date: 19-Jul-2021
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Source: Climate Policy 21 (8): 1066-1085 (2021)
Abstract (english): 
Approximately 50–75% of aviation's climate impact is caused by non-CO2 effects, like the production of ozone and the formation of contrail cirrus clouds, which can be effectively prevented by re-routing flights around highly climate-sensitive areas. Here, we discuss options how to incentivize re-routing approaches and apply multicriteria trajectory optimizations to demonstrate the feasibility of the concept of climate-charged airspaces (CCAs). We show that although climate-optimized re-routing results in slightly longer flight times, increased fuel consumption and higher operating costs, it is more climate-friendly compared to a cost-optimized routing. In accordance to other studies, we find that the averaged temperature response over 100 years (ATR (Formula presented.)) of a single flight can be reduced by up to 40%. However, if mitigation efforts are associated with a direct increase in costs, there is a need for climate policies. To address the lack of incentivizing airlines to internalize their climate costs, this study focuses on the CCA concept, which imposes a climate charge on airlines when operating in highly climate-sensitive areas. If CCAs are (partly) bypassed, both climate impact and operating costs of a flight can be reduced: a more climate-friendly routing becomes economically attractive. For an exemplary North-Atlantic network, CCAs create a financial incentive for climate mitigation, achieving on average more than 90% of the climate impact reduction potential of climate-optimized trajectories (theoretical maximum, benchmark). Key policy insights Existing climate policies for aviation do not address non- (Formula presented.) effects, which are very sensitive to the location and the timing of the emission. By imposing a temporary climate charge for airlines that operate in highly climate-sensitive regions, the trade-off between economic viability and environmental compatibility could be resolved: Climate impact mitigation of non- (Formula presented.) effects coincides with cutting costs. To ensure easy planning and verification, climate charges are calculated analogously to en-route and terminal charges. For climate mitigation it is therefore neither necessary to monitor emissions ((Formula presented.) (Formula presented.), etc.) nor to integrate complex non- (Formula presented.) effects into flight planning procedures of airlines. Its implementation is feasible and effective.
DOI: 10.15480/882.3871
ISSN: 1752-7457
Journal: Climate policy 
Institute: Lufttransportsysteme M-28 
Document Type: Article
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives)
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext

Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Mar 26, 2023


checked on Mar 26, 2023


Last Week
Last month
checked on Jun 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM


Note about this record

Cite this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons