TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Assessment of EFD and CFD capability for KRISO Container Ship added power in head and oblique waves
 
Options

Assessment of EFD and CFD capability for KRISO Container Ship added power in head and oblique waves

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2022-01-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Sanada, Yugo  
Kim, Dong Hwan  
Sadat-Hosseini, Hamid  
Stern, Frederick  
Hossain, Md Alfaz  
Wu, Ping Chen  
Toda, Yasuyuki  
Otzen, Janne  
Simonsen, Claus  
Abdel-Maksoud, Moustafa  orcid-logo
Scharf, Martin  
Grigoropoulos, Gregory  
Institut
Fluiddynamik und Schiffstheorie M-8  
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/11266
Journal
Ocean engineering  
Volume
243
Article Number
110224
Citation
Ocean Engineering 243: 110224 (2022-01-01)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110224
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85120358912
EFD and CFD capability assessment for KCS added power (AP) in head and oblique waves are conducted based on experiments from three facilities using three different model sizes and CFD from five institutes. The analysis includes the standard deviation (SD) in both CFD and EFD to identify facility biases, scale effects and CFD errors for motions, self-propulsion (SP), propulsive efficiency (η) and AP. The overall SD%D (D: EFD values) for all calm water SP variables and AP variables is 9% and 11%, respectively. SP correlates with Re via advance coefficient J(Re) and SP points lie along nondimensional propeller load curves. AP vs. λ/L correlates with large bow relative motion such that the wave effects on J(λ/L) have the same scaling as the model size effect J(Re). Logarithmic derivative analysis of EFD data shows that for head waves the added resistance (AR) and η are responsible for 70 vs. 30%AP, respectively, whereas for oblique waves the AR and η are responsible for 55 vs. 38%AP, respectively. The overall conclusion is that the experimental and CFD approaches are of sufficient accuracy to be useful for design.
Subjects
Added powering
Added resistance
CFD
EFD
KCS
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback