TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Variability in femoral preparation and implantation between surgeons using manual and powered impaction in total hip arthroplasty
 
Options

Variability in femoral preparation and implantation between surgeons using manual and powered impaction in total hip arthroplasty

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4130
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2022-01-20
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Konow, Tobias 
Bätz, Johanna  
Beverland, David E.  
Board, Tim N.  
Lampe, Frank  
Püschel, Klaus  
Morlock, Michael  
Institut
Biomechanik M-3  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.4130
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/11627
Journal
Arthroplasty today  
Volume
14
Start Page
14
End Page
21
Citation
Arthroplasty Today 14: 14-21 (2022-04-01)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.005
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85123071490
Publisher
Elsevier
Background: The influence of the surgical process on implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF) as major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rarely been studied because of the difficulty in quantification. Meanwhile, registry analyses have clearly shown a decrease in complications with increasing experience. The goal of this study was to determine the extent of variability in THA stem implantation between highly experienced surgeons with respect to implant size, position, press-fit, contact area, primary stability, and the effect of using a powered impaction tool. Methods: Primary hip stems were implanted in 16 cadaveric femur pairs by three experienced surgeons using manual and powered impaction. Quantitative CTs were taken before and after each process step, and stem tilt, canal-fill-ratio, press-fit, and contact determined. Eleven femur pairs were additionally tested for primary stability under cyclic loading conditions. Results: Manual impactions led to higher variations in press-fit and contact area between the surgeons than powered impactions. Stem tilt and implant sizing varied between surgeons but not between impaction methods. Larger stems exhibited less micromotion than smaller stems. Conclusions: Larger implants may increase PPF risk, while smaller implants reduce primary stability. The reduced variation for powered impactions indicates that appropriate measures may promote a more standardized process. The variations between these experienced surgeons may represent an acceptable range for this specific stem design. Variability in the implantation process warrants further investigations since certain deviations, for example, a stem tilt toward varus, might increase bone stresses and PPF risk.
Subjects
Implant-position
Implant-size
Periprosthetic fracture
Surgical experience
Surgical process variability
Templating
DDC Class
600: Technik
610: Medizin
More Funding Information
Publishing fees were supported by Funding Program “Open Access Publishing” of Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH).
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S2352344121001977-main.pdf

Size

1.12 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback