Publisher DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1791.R1
Title: Modified acetabular component liner designs are not superior to standard liners at reducing the risk of revision : an analysis of 151,096 cementless total hip arthroplasties from the German Arthroplasty Registry
Language: English
Authors: Krull, Paula 
Steinbrück, Arnd 
Grimberg, Alexander W. 
Melsheimer, Oliver 
Morlock, Michael 
Perka, Carsten 
Keywords: acetabular components; acetabular liners; Angulated liner; Arthroplasty registries; cementless THAs; comorbidities; Cox proportional-hazards model; Hip arthroplasty; Liner design; Lipped liner; mechanical complications; Mechanical failure; Offset liner; polyethylene (PE); primary THAs; Registry study; Standard liner
Issue Date: 1-Jul-2022
Source: The bone & joint journal 104-B (7) : 801-810 (2022-07-01)
Abstract (english): 
AIMS: Registry studies on modified acetabular polyethylene (PE) liner designs are limited. We investigated the influence of standard and modified PE acetabular liner designs on the revision rate for mechanical complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We analyzed 151,096 primary cementless THAs from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) between November 2012 and November 2020. Cumulative incidence of revision for mechanical complications for standard and four modified PE liners (lipped, offset, angulated/offset, and angulated) was determined using competing risk analysis at one and seven years. Confounders were investigated with a Cox proportional-hazards model. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 868 days (interquartile range 418 to 1,364). The offset liner design reduced the risk of revision (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.92)), while the angulated/offset liner increased the risk of revision for mechanical failure (HR 1.81 (95% CI 1.38 to 2.36)). The cumulative incidence of revision was lowest for the offset liner at one and seven years (1.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 1.3) and 1.8% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.0)). No difference was found between standard, lipped, and angulated liner designs. Higher age at index primary THA and an Elixhauser Comorbidity Index greater than 0 increased the revision risk in the first year after surgery. Implantation of a higher proportion of a single design of liner in a hospital reduced revision risk slightly but significantly (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of standard acetabular component liners remains a good choice in primary uncemented THA, as most modified liner designs were not associated with a reduced risk of revision for mechanical failure. Offset liner designs were found to be beneficial and angulated/offset liner designs were associated with higher risks of revision.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11420/13173
ISSN: 2049-4408
Journal: The bone & joint journal 
Institute: Biomechanik M-3 
Document Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Publications without fulltext

Show full item record

Page view(s)

13
checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

Items in TORE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.