Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4730
Fulltext available
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeimann, Joachim-
dc.contributor.authorBrosig-Koch, Jeannette-
dc.contributor.authorHeinrich, Timo-
dc.contributor.authorHennig-Schmidt, Heike-
dc.contributor.authorKeser, Claudia-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-01T06:11:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-01T06:11:47Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 200: 1076-1089 (2022-08)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/13320-
dc.description.abstractPublic good experiments are usually conducted in the laboratory using the voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM). We use a real public good (CO2 emission rights) with comparatively large groups (up to 60 subjects) and compare the results with corresponding experiments based on the VCM. Our treatment variations include group size and the feedback that subjects receive after each round. Our data reveal that, in contrast to the VCM, subjects dealing with a real public good relate their decisions to those of their group members in the lab only in the first rounds and do not change their contributions thereafter. These observations suggest that, when faced with a real public good, subjects use the whole group, including “players” outside the lab, as a main reference point. In this way, contributions made to the real public good in the lab tend to depend on the salience of mutual cooperation benefits existing outside the lab. Our findings help to understand the transferability of previous laboratory research on the VCM to real public good provision.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherElsevierde_DE
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of economic behavior & organizationde_DE
dc.rightsCopyrightde_DE
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/de_DE
dc.subjectPublic goodde_DE
dc.subjectLarge groupsde_DE
dc.subjectReal Public Good (RPG)de_DE
dc.subjectVoluntary Contribution Mechanism (VCM)de_DE
dc.subjectCO2 emission reductionde_DE
dc.subjectSaliencede_DE
dc.subject.ddc004: Informatikde_DE
dc.subject.ddc330: Wirtschaftde_DE
dc.subject.ddc550: Geowissenschaftende_DE
dc.subject.ddc600: Technikde_DE
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftende_DE
dc.titleCO2 emission reduction : real public good provision by large groups in the laboratoryde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4730-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.0193167-
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
tuhh.abstract.englishPublic good experiments are usually conducted in the laboratory using the voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM). We use a real public good (CO2 emission rights) with comparatively large groups (up to 60 subjects) and compare the results with corresponding experiments based on the VCM. Our treatment variations include group size and the feedback that subjects receive after each round. Our data reveal that, in contrast to the VCM, subjects dealing with a real public good relate their decisions to those of their group members in the lab only in the first rounds and do not change their contributions thereafter. These observations suggest that, when faced with a real public good, subjects use the whole group, including “players” outside the lab, as a main reference point. In this way, contributions made to the real public good in the lab tend to depend on the salience of mutual cooperation benefits existing outside the lab. Our findings help to understand the transferability of previous laboratory research on the VCM to real public good provision.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.027-
tuhh.publication.instituteDigital Economics W-5de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4730-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
tuhh.gvk.hasppnfalse-
tuhh.hasurnfalse-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.issueAugust 2022de_DE
tuhh.container.volume200de_DE
tuhh.container.startpage1076de_DE
tuhh.container.endpage1089de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134685157de_DE
local.status.inpressfalsede_DE
local.type.versionsubmittedVersionde_DE
local.publisher.peerreviewedtruede_DE
datacite.resourceTypeArticle-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralJournalArticle-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20240531-
item.creatorGNDWeimann, Joachim-
item.creatorGNDBrosig-Koch, Jeannette-
item.creatorGNDHeinrich, Timo-
item.creatorGNDHennig-Schmidt, Heike-
item.creatorGNDKeser, Claudia-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.mappedtypeArticle-
item.creatorOrcidWeimann, Joachim-
item.creatorOrcidBrosig-Koch, Jeannette-
item.creatorOrcidHeinrich, Timo-
item.creatorOrcidHennig-Schmidt, Heike-
item.creatorOrcidKeser, Claudia-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDigital Economics W-5-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4500-8247-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4420-0787-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6827-1374-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2841-4657-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5562-5900-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie (W)-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
co2_emission_reduction.pdf1,06 MBAdobe PDFEmbargoed until May 31, 2024    Request a copy
Thumbnail
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

114
checked on Jun 7, 2023

Download(s)

18
checked on Jun 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

Items in TORE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.