TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. Renewable fuel options for aviation – A System-Wide comparison of Drop-In and non Drop-In fuel options
 
Options

Renewable fuel options for aviation – A System-Wide comparison of Drop-In and non Drop-In fuel options

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2023-02-01
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Quante, Gunnar  
Bullerdiek, Nils 
Bube, Stefan  orcid-logo
Neuling, Ulf  orcid-logo
Kaltschmitt, Martin  
Institut
Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9  
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/14496
Journal
Fuel  
Volume
333
Article Number
126269
Citation
Fuel 333: 126269 (2023-02-01)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126269
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85140272343
The air transport sector's contribution to anthropogenic climate forcing is estimated at around 4 %. In this respect, alternative fuels are considered as a key measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the air transport system and thus to reduce the contribution of commercial aviation to anthropogenic climate change. Nevertheless, so far the usage-shares of alternative fuels are below 1 %. Thus, the goal of this paper is to analyse a broad selection of aviation fuel options for their greenhouse gas reduction potential based on a set of nine assessment criteria. The fuel options studied are blended synthetic kerosene and neat synthetic kerosene fuels, three alcohols (methanol, ethanol and butanol) and three gases (methane, ammonia and hydrogen). For these fuels a multi-criteria assessment based on a five-step ordinal scale is performed. The assessment results show that the availability of some biogenic feedstock is not sufficient to replace the present overall energy demand of aviation; while the availability of non-biogenic fuels might increase in the near- to mid-term. In general, alternative kerosene-like fuel options are mainly constrained by lacking production capacities, while alcohols and gases considered are constrained by aircraft modifications or development of new aircraft types. All discussed fuel options have the potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions of commercial aviation substantially also from a life cycle perspective. Within the next decade, especially alternative kerosene-like options with (intermediate) products experiencing demand from other sectors, such as FT-SPK or AtJ-SPK, show a high development potential. The same holds for hydrogen provided that a hydrogen fueled aircraft will be brought successfully to the market.
Subjects
Alternative fuels
Fuels and energy storage
Propulsion
Funding(s)
Copenhagen Airport: a Lighthouse for the introduction of sustainable aviation solutions for the future  
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback