Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4859
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLasser, Jana-
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Jürgen-
dc.contributor.authorLösch, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorRöwert, Ronny-
dc.contributor.authorHeck, Tamara-
dc.contributor.authorBluemel, Clemens-
dc.contributor.authorNeufend, Maike-
dc.contributor.authorSteinhardt, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorSkupien, Stefan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T08:26:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-16T08:26:16Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-18-
dc.identifier.citationF1000Research: F1000Research 11:535 (2022)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn2046-1402de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/14574-
dc.description.abstractResearch that investigates respective researchers’ engagement in Open Science varies widely in the topics addressed, methods employed, and disciplines investigated, which makes it difficult to integrate and compare its results. To investigate current outcomes of Open Science research, and to get a better understanding on well-researched topics and research gaps, we aimed at providing an openly accessible overview of empirical studies that focus on different aspects of Open Science in different scientific disciplines, academic groups and geographical regions. In this paper, we describe a data set of studies about Open Science practices retrieved following a PRISMA approach to compile a literature review. We included studies from the Scopus and Web of Science databases with keywords relating to Open Science between the years 2000 and 2020, as well as a snowball search for relevant articles. Studies that did not investigate any aspect of Open Science, or weren’t peer-reviewed were excluded, resulting in a total of 695 remaining studies. The data set was collaboratively annotated to ensure intercoder reliability of the coded data.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherF 1000 Researchde_DE
dc.relation.ispartofF1000Researchde_DE
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0de_DE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_DE
dc.subject.ddc300: Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede_DE
dc.titleMapOSR - A mapping review dataset of empirical studies on Open Sciencede_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4859-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.0208545-
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
tuhh.abstract.englishResearch that investigates respective researchers’ engagement in Open Science varies widely in the topics addressed, methods employed, and disciplines investigated, which makes it difficult to integrate and compare its results. To investigate current outcomes of Open Science research, and to get a better understanding on well-researched topics and research gaps, we aimed at providing an openly accessible overview of empirical studies that focus on different aspects of Open Science in different scientific disciplines, academic groups and geographical regions. In this paper, we describe a data set of studies about Open Science practices retrieved following a PRISMA approach to compile a literature review. We included studies from the Scopus and Web of Science databases with keywords relating to Open Science between the years 2000 and 2020, as well as a snowball search for relevant articles. Studies that did not investigate any aspect of Open Science, or weren’t peer-reviewed were excluded, resulting in a total of 695 remaining studies. The data set was collaboratively annotated to ensure intercoder reliability of the coded data.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.12688/f1000research.121665.1-
tuhh.publication.instituteTechnische Bildung und Hochschuldidaktik T-3de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4859-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.relation.projectOpen-Access-Publikationskosten / 2022-2024 / Technische Universität Hamburg (TUHH)de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
tuhh.container.articlenumber11:535de_DE
local.status.inpressfalsede_DE
local.type.versionpublishedVersionde_DE
local.funding.infoJL has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101026507 – STAY.de_DE
local.publisher.peerreviewedtruede_DE
datacite.resourceTypeArticle-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralJournalArticle-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.creatorOrcidLasser, Jana-
item.creatorOrcidSchneider, Jürgen-
item.creatorOrcidLösch, Thomas-
item.creatorOrcidRöwert, Ronny-
item.creatorOrcidHeck, Tamara-
item.creatorOrcidBluemel, Clemens-
item.creatorOrcidNeufend, Maike-
item.creatorOrcidSteinhardt, Isabel-
item.creatorOrcidSkupien, Stefan-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorGNDLasser, Jana-
item.creatorGNDSchneider, Jürgen-
item.creatorGNDLösch, Thomas-
item.creatorGNDRöwert, Ronny-
item.creatorGNDHeck, Tamara-
item.creatorGNDBluemel, Clemens-
item.creatorGNDNeufend, Maike-
item.creatorGNDSteinhardt, Isabel-
item.creatorGNDSkupien, Stefan-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.mappedtypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptTechnische Bildung und Hochschuldidaktik T-3-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4274-4580-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3772-4198-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2582-6787-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3962-1472-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5519-6395-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8519-8738-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Technologie und Innovation in der Bildung (T)-
crisitem.project.funderDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-
crisitem.project.funderid501100001659-
crisitem.project.funderrorid018mejw64-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
f544f742-16bd-42fb-a871-6b5934741035_121665_-_jana_lasser.pdfVerlags-PDF813,2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Thumbnail
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Mar 29, 2023

Download(s)

31
checked on Mar 29, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons