TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures : a systematic review of test setups
 
Options

Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures : a systematic review of test setups

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4870
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2022-03-19
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Hinz, Nico  
Dehoust, Julius  
Münch, Matthias  
Seide, Klaus  
Barth, Tobias  
Schulz, Arndt-Peter  
Frosch, Karl-Heinz  
Hartel, Maximilian  
Institut
Integrierte Schaltungen E-9  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.4870
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/14588
Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery  
Volume
48
Issue
5
Start Page
3541
End Page
3560
Citation
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 48 (5): 3541-3560 (2022)
Publisher DOI
10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85126472147
PubMed ID
35305114
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Peer Reviewed
true
Purpose: Optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation of acetabular fractures are important in avoiding secondary dislocation and osteoarthritis. Biomechanical studies of treatment options of acetabular fractures aim to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods. As the setup of the biomechanical test can influence the experimental results, this review aimed to analyze the characteristics, comparability and clinical implications of studies on biomechanical test setups and finite element analyses in the fixation of acetabular fractures. Methods: A systematic literature research was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. 44 studies conducting biomechanical analyses of fixation of acetabular fractures were identified, which met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and which were published in English between 2000 and April 16, 2021. The studies were analyzed with respect to distinct parameters, including fracture type, material of pelvis model, investigated fixation construct, loading direction, loading protocol, maximum loading force, outcome parameter and measurement method. Results: In summary, there was no standardized test setup within the studies on fixation constructs for acetabular fractures. It is therefore difficult to compare the studies directly, as they employ a variety of different test parameters. Furthermore, the clinical implications of the biomechanical studies should be scrutinized, since several test parameters were not based on observations of the human physiology. Conclusion: The limited comparability and restricted clinical implications should be kept in mind when interpreting the results of biomechanical studies and when designing test setups to evaluate fixation methods for acetabular fractures.
Subjects
Acetabular fracture
Biomechanical analysis
Clinical implications
Finite element analysis
Fracture fixation
Inter-comparability
DDC Class
570: Biowissenschaften, Biologie
610: Medizin
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Biomechanical_analysis_of_fixation_methods_in_acet.pdf

Size

1.12 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback