Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4870
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHinz, Nico-
dc.contributor.authorDehoust, Julius-
dc.contributor.authorMünch, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorSeide, Klaus-
dc.contributor.authorBarth, Tobias-
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Arndt Peter-
dc.contributor.authorFrosch, Karl-Heinz-
dc.contributor.authorHartel, Maximilian-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T10:31:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-18T10:31:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-19-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 48 (5): 3541-3560 (2022)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn1863-9933de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/14588-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation of acetabular fractures are important in avoiding secondary dislocation and osteoarthritis. Biomechanical studies of treatment options of acetabular fractures aim to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods. As the setup of the biomechanical test can influence the experimental results, this review aimed to analyze the characteristics, comparability and clinical implications of studies on biomechanical test setups and finite element analyses in the fixation of acetabular fractures. Methods: A systematic literature research was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. 44 studies conducting biomechanical analyses of fixation of acetabular fractures were identified, which met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and which were published in English between 2000 and April 16, 2021. The studies were analyzed with respect to distinct parameters, including fracture type, material of pelvis model, investigated fixation construct, loading direction, loading protocol, maximum loading force, outcome parameter and measurement method. Results: In summary, there was no standardized test setup within the studies on fixation constructs for acetabular fractures. It is therefore difficult to compare the studies directly, as they employ a variety of different test parameters. Furthermore, the clinical implications of the biomechanical studies should be scrutinized, since several test parameters were not based on observations of the human physiology. Conclusion: The limited comparability and restricted clinical implications should be kept in mind when interpreting the results of biomechanical studies and when designing test setups to evaluate fixation methods for acetabular fractures.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherSpringer Medizinde_DE
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgeryde_DE
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0de_DE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_DE
dc.subjectAcetabular fracturede_DE
dc.subjectBiomechanical analysisde_DE
dc.subjectClinical implicationsde_DE
dc.subjectFinite element analysisde_DE
dc.subjectFracture fixationde_DE
dc.subjectInter-comparabilityde_DE
dc.subject.ddc570: Biowissenschaften, Biologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc610: Medizinde_DE
dc.titleBiomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures : a systematic review of test setupsde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4870-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.0208721-
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
tuhh.abstract.englishPurpose: Optimal anatomical reduction and stable fixation of acetabular fractures are important in avoiding secondary dislocation and osteoarthritis. Biomechanical studies of treatment options of acetabular fractures aim to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different fixation methods. As the setup of the biomechanical test can influence the experimental results, this review aimed to analyze the characteristics, comparability and clinical implications of studies on biomechanical test setups and finite element analyses in the fixation of acetabular fractures. Methods: A systematic literature research was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. 44 studies conducting biomechanical analyses of fixation of acetabular fractures were identified, which met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and which were published in English between 2000 and April 16, 2021. The studies were analyzed with respect to distinct parameters, including fracture type, material of pelvis model, investigated fixation construct, loading direction, loading protocol, maximum loading force, outcome parameter and measurement method. Results: In summary, there was no standardized test setup within the studies on fixation constructs for acetabular fractures. It is therefore difficult to compare the studies directly, as they employ a variety of different test parameters. Furthermore, the clinical implications of the biomechanical studies should be scrutinized, since several test parameters were not based on observations of the human physiology. Conclusion: The limited comparability and restricted clinical implications should be kept in mind when interpreting the results of biomechanical studies and when designing test setups to evaluate fixation methods for acetabular fractures.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9-
tuhh.publication.instituteIntegrierte Schaltungen E-9de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4870-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.issue5de_DE
tuhh.container.volume48de_DE
tuhh.container.startpage3541de_DE
tuhh.container.endpage3560de_DE
dc.identifier.pmid35305114de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126472147de_DE
local.status.inpressfalsede_DE
local.type.versionpublishedVersionde_DE
local.publisher.peerreviewedtruede_DE
datacite.resourceTypeArticle-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralJournalArticle-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.creatorOrcidHinz, Nico-
item.creatorOrcidDehoust, Julius-
item.creatorOrcidMünch, Matthias-
item.creatorOrcidSeide, Klaus-
item.creatorOrcidBarth, Tobias-
item.creatorOrcidSchulz, Arndt Peter-
item.creatorOrcidFrosch, Karl-Heinz-
item.creatorOrcidHartel, Maximilian-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.creatorGNDHinz, Nico-
item.creatorGNDDehoust, Julius-
item.creatorGNDMünch, Matthias-
item.creatorGNDSeide, Klaus-
item.creatorGNDBarth, Tobias-
item.creatorGNDSchulz, Arndt Peter-
item.creatorGNDFrosch, Karl-Heinz-
item.creatorGNDHartel, Maximilian-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.mappedtypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptIntegrierte Schaltungen E-9-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9840-3865-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9195-1869-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4978-2878-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Elektrotechnik, Informatik und Mathematik (E)-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Biomechanical_analysis_of_fixation_methods_in_acet.pdf1,15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Thumbnail
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

65
checked on Mar 29, 2023

Download(s)

45
checked on Mar 29, 2023

PubMed Central
Citations

2
checked on Mar 29, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons